From what I have read on different boards and seen for myself, I think that PCGS is prejudicial in their grading whether it's a crossover or not. I have found 1 grading company that doesn't seem to be prejudiced in the slightest and that's ANACS.
Their grading standards seem to be 100% consistent. I honestly believe that if an ANACS coin was broken out of its holder and resubmitted, it would get exactly the same grade already assigned. Whereas I have seen many coins from PCGS and NGC that I felt were either overgraded or undergraded, that does not hold true with ANACS. I have not seen 1 grade that I disputed in either direction.
Recently, I got to see a number of old coppers graded by ANACS which impressed me greatly. It appears that they use EAC grading standards for the coppers. These standards are notoriously tougher than the market-grading standards used elsewhere. As I tend to be tough on my coin grading (whether it be for purchase or resale), I love having a grading company that conforms to my standards.
ANACS has been overlooked for the most part as a grading company and PCGS and NGC still command higher prices, but I hope to see that change in the future. If you want a grading company that truly evaluates the coin itself without consideration for the submitter or market value, ANACS is the way to go. This is the only grading company I'll use since I'm much more interested in coins that are represented accurately than in getting that next point in a grade for the money.
Their grading standards seem to be 100% consistent. I honestly believe that if an ANACS coin was broken out of its holder and resubmitted, it would get exactly the same grade already assigned. Whereas I have seen many coins from PCGS and NGC that I felt were either overgraded or undergraded, that does not hold true with ANACS. I have not seen 1 grade that I disputed in either direction.
Recently, I got to see a number of old coppers graded by ANACS which impressed me greatly. It appears that they use EAC grading standards for the coppers. These standards are notoriously tougher than the market-grading standards used elsewhere. As I tend to be tough on my coin grading (whether it be for purchase or resale), I love having a grading company that conforms to my standards.
ANACS has been overlooked for the most part as a grading company and PCGS and NGC still command higher prices, but I hope to see that change in the future. If you want a grading company that truly evaluates the coin itself without consideration for the submitter or market value, ANACS is the way to go. This is the only grading company I'll use since I'm much more interested in coins that are represented accurately than in getting that next point in a grade for the money.
























