| Author |
Replies: 58 / Views: 4,669 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
1091 Posts |
I imagine the grading system must have evolved over time because I don't think anyone would create a system of grades 1 to 70 on purpose. I still like the old system of... good, very good, fine, very fine, extremely fine and Uncirculated. Without the numbers. And if you were adding numbers why not make them 1 to 100. OK, I've shown my ignorance (again), can someone explain why 1 to 70 was chosen?
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
3147 Posts |
The guys got tired of counting so they quit at 70! I to favor About Good, Good, Very Good, Fine, Very Fine, Extremely Fine, AU and Unc. but those simple designations would stop the price gouging from one MS- grade to the next. We have all seen it! MS63 is $50 and MS 64 is $2000 yet no one can tell you why other than the fact fewer have been graded in that grade. Seems to me the grading companies, who are in the business of selling high grade coins in one way or another, besides just offering their slabbing service have put them selves in the position to CREATE markets and all they needed was a little time to convince collectors that they were right and we were wrong. Before long they could actually get $100 bucks for a state hood quarter just because SOMEONE says it's a high grade coin. The only people who will loose, if and when this bubble bursts, is the little guys as the grading companies have already got their money. The plastic coffins for modern day coins are just that! Coffins many collectors will get buried with!
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
2884 Posts |
Howdy Terry, A few months back I expressed my sentiments about missing the day-to-day use of adjectival grading! Yes,I know numbers are associated with the adjectival grades, 4,8,12,20,40,50 and 60(I got buried!!!!) No,I did not include the "tweeners", on purpose because they are not needed given an adequate short verbal description! You could easily look at one grade by description and/or photo grade and see if the coin met those standards. Keep going up or down in grade based on whether the coin met "all" of the criteria of each state of preservation! Mint state was divided initially as MS60, 65 or 70. Each carried a clear definition of what was expected to attain the grade. MS63 came in(choice), and to me, it merely means a nice clean Uncirculated coin. MS65 is special, a Gem and a truly clean coin. Of course MS70 is and was perfect preservation. Sheldon developed the 70 scale for Early Large Cents as a way of determining relative value, 1 being a basal state coin, 70 being perfection.It did not end up working very well. It was slowly adapted to other coinage and many feel we need a 100 number scale! I agree that divisional number scales are a way to charge more. A nice high-end example of a grade did and still would command a premium over an average for grade. As I said once before, MS61? Give me a break! AU58, another break! MS66, Same thing. Yes, I accept the 70 point system because that is the world we live in. I just don’t have to like it! I'm ducking already! LOL Mike 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7123 Posts |
Terry and Mike have hit the nail on the head with their responses!!
Rick
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1203 Posts |
quote: Originally posted by Mike
I accept the 70 point system because that is the world we live in. I just don’t have to like it!
NO Mike you don't have to live that way, and to make my point, I grade my own coins, place a value on each one, and when someone accepts transfer on the coin, they accept those decisions...or no sale! That is the real world I live in and enjoy every minute of it!
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
954 Posts |
I have to throw my Two Cents in here. I just can't resist so please take it as you will but not personally. The whole matter of coin toning is really very simple. Toning is a form of oxidation and does progress if not stopped. If you like to call it a Mint State or not doesn't really matter. The buyer and seller, both, can see if a coin is toned or not. They can decide if they want to buy it or not or sell it or not. You don't need to change the grade but simply state MS-65 Toned will work fine. Some folks like toning and some don't. Some folks believe that a coin, properly cleaned, is just fine while others are shocked at the thought. Here is the option. Collect what you like. You don't need to justify it. I have purchased cleaned and toned coins just because I like the way the coin looked I don't pay too much attention to all the rehortic I hear. Collecting should be a fun thing not a matter of "What's worth more". The value of a coin has been, and always will be, established by what the general market is willing to pay for it. I hope I didn't offend anyone as that was not my intent. I'm just stating, right or wrong, my position. catman
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
3147 Posts |
Catman as always, you are a gentleman with an opinion that is greatly admired by many. I am with you on this one 100%. Thats the beauty of this hobby....To each his own!!!!
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
2884 Posts |
Hi everyone! I think all of us posting here and elsewhere always show respect for other folks opinions. This is how we get to see things and think about things from many views. As always a great learning experience. Thanks to all! Mike 
|
|
Valued Member
United States
218 Posts |
quote: Originally posted by toast
I imagine the grading system must have evolved over time because I don't think anyone would create a system of grades 1 to 70 on purpose, can someone explain why 1 to 70 was chosen?
Dr. William H Sheldon "invented" the 1-70 grading scale as a way to correlate condition to price in regards to US Large Cents. Basically he said a 1 is a basal state coin and should sell for $1, whereas a 4 os a good coin and should sell for 4 times what a basal state coin would sell for. He extended the scale as far as was neccessary for his purpose (large cent prices) and a mint sate coin (MS-65) should sell for 65 times what the same coin in basal state should sell for. His grading system became popular with Early US cent collectors and then later with the US numismatic community as a whole and so it has stuck.
|
|
New Member
United States
8 Posts |
My apologies for taking a week to participate, but the great hunt for computer problem solutions has kept me quite busy. Here’s a few of my thoughts on other’s comments, and like catman’s they are only my opinion. quote: Originally posted by longnine009 Hey JD do you still have the link to your black beauty nickel?
No sir, it wasn’t mine. It belongs to Ray and it’s in a glass case that he chooses not to open so a really good image is out of the question. Maybe I’ll acquire one someday. After all, I do know the person who claims to have “cooked” at least 90% of those on the market, slabbed and raw. (Cooked as used here doe not refer to the use of heat.) I know his background and the process used so I believe he probably did exactly what he said. Unfortunate, but that’s life. quote: Originally posted by Mike Maybe I'm missing the point, by why does oxidation of the metal on coins cause such a controversy? Many have pointed out it is natural, it does damage the surface and eventually if left unchecked can really ruin the appearance of the coin. This debate is very interesting because science is crossing paths with asthetics and after all beauty truly is in the "eye of the beholder"!
Why does it cause such controversy? IMHO, it's the old “mine is better than yours” attitude, even if it’s only subconscious. I’ve been hearing the word “damaged” used by blast white collectors for more years than I can image. It seems they’re constantly trying to convince everyone that it’s the ONLY thing to collect. Possibly to keep the values of those coins increasing. It’s always about money (pun intended). They’re damaged! Oh paleaseeeee! quote: Originally posted by Metalman I was looking thru his rotating display case, and I see within a Morgan dollar in an old PCGS slab, now the grade on this coin was MS-65 ,, the coin was beautifully toned,, but the slab did not carry any designation that it was toned when slabbed, My Mind went to this thread and I asked about the coin and the toning, the dealers reply , the coin was not toned when slabbed, but the result of years within the slab ,, I asked what the grade reduction was and the resulting price difference would be?
He said( the grade is on the slab as is the price !!!!!)
I guess he hasnt heard that toning is damage!!!
I don’t think the cost is going to go down just because a coin is toned, whether it was toned in the slab or not. There are simply too many collectors that find toning appealing and if they have the funds the cost doesn’t seem to matter a lot. quote: Originally posted by Mike Buy from your friends and from those you know and trust who don't fall over and chase every fad that comes down the road. Be patient and even this fad will pass, in fact, based on the concerns expressed in this thread it may be happening now!
Yes, the fad is cyclic and the best time to buy is when it is “out of phase”. But, just like plaid golf pants, it will return. All it takes is a younger generation of collectors to discover it (again) and off we go again on rabbit’s wild ride. quote: Originally posted by Metalman I happen to agree with longnine, the collectors are at the mercy of the whims and views of the selected few when it comes to things like this,, and it can cost the collector many dollars based on their whims .
it can also make many thousands of dollars for the right people of influence !!
Yes again, if one listens to the whims and views of what is popular. Just because you (or a group) like to collect a particular coin is no reason for me to like it too. But, it’s also taken nearly 40 years for me to develop my own collecting ideas and not be concerned about what others think. quote: Originally posted by catman Some folks like toning and some don't. Some folks believe that a coin, properly cleaned, is just fine while others are shocked at the thought. Here is the option. Collect what you like. You don't need to justify it. I have purchased cleaned and toned coins just because I like the way the coin looked I don't pay too much attention to all the rehortic I hear. Collecting should be a fun thing not a matter of "What's worth more". The value of a coin has been, and always will be, established by what the general market is willing to pay for it.
Collect what you like. What a clever idea! I wonder why I never thought of that? Someone should write that down. Seriously. I’ve never purchased a toned coin and paid a premium for it. My philosophy is, “Another will be along soon.” And unless you’re collecting in the rare coin market, it pretty much holds true. Also, most of my coins I image on my web site have been gifts to me. Lastly, I have truly enjoyed reading and participating in this thread. Thank you for everyone’s point of view. JDW
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1203 Posts |
I for one, like to read what you have to say on these subjects. While we may not agree 100% of the time, I can usually see some reasoning and thought behind your positions. It's great just to have you posting again JD.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
2884 Posts |
Hey JDW, I have one question about your replys to others posts. Paleaseeee!!!!tell me the difference between.... But, it’s also taken nearly 40 years for me to develop my own collecting ideas and not be concerned about what others think...and...Collect what you like. You don't need to justify it. Sounds the same to me! Mike 
|
|
New Member
United States
8 Posts |
quote: Originally posted by Mike
Hey JDW, I have one question about your replys to others posts. Paleaseeee!!!!tell me the difference between.... But, it’s also taken nearly 40 years for me to develop my own collecting ideas and not be concerned about what others think...and...Collect what you like. You don't need to justify it. Sounds the same to me! Mike
Actually when you place them side by side they do appear amazingly similar. The former I collect by while the later I share. The fact that they could be considered the same idea is OK with me.  JDW quote: Originally posted by OldDan
I for one, like to read what you have to say on these subjects. While we may not agree 100% of the time, I can usually see some reasoning and thought behind your positions. It's great just to have you posting again JD.
Howdy OldDan. I'm glad you enjoy reading my ramblings, but don't expect it too happen very often. I'm much more of a "listener" than a talker". JDW
Edited by JDW 07/15/2005 12:13 pm
|
| |
Replies: 58 / Views: 4,669 |
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use
|
| Coin Community Forum |
© 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums |
| It took 0.34 seconds to rattle this change. |
 |
|