| Author |
Replies: 34 / Views: 5,167 |
|
Valued Member
Bulgaria
474 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
Looks authentic , the only thing that questions me is the S MM looks closer to the E instead of the C . As I'm not sure if there are variable locations for Buffalo mint marks . I'm stating this from a sharp photo of a Buff from the early 20's with an S mint . Any way this Nickel shows a little wear , real nice horn and a not so common nice tail . Date & mint fairly sharp . AU-55 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
20753 Posts |
Rather a expensive coin. And since your in a different country from here, must have cost you a lot in just postage and insurance. Looks real to me. 1,550,000 minted. Considered a rather key dated coin. I wouldn't even dare to ask how much you paid for that coin but whatever you did, you got a great coin. Note the full horn. Great looking coin. Wish it was mine. 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
The curvature of the S and the serifs don't seem to match the other 1921 S nickels I looked at. There are at least two mintmarks positions other than the one this coin has. I haven't located a known genune coin with that position, but that doesn't mean it doesn't exist. I've only looked at a few examples. Sample size is too small.
|
|
Valued Member
 Bulgaria
474 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
338 Posts |
You have a very nice coin sir! In that condition (at least AU55), your nickel deserves a top tier slab and a BIG price tag! Well done!
|
|
Valued Member
United States
271 Posts |
I have my concerns about the authenticity of the coin. The area of concern is circled below.  The variegation of reflected light seems to suggest deformation/reformation of the metal where the mint-mark should be.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7627 Posts |
Looks like the real deal to me! Very nice pick up and solid AU55 to 58.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
5464 Posts |
I applaud your pictures! 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
Quote: I managed to find only 2 pieces with the same position of "S" and with a thick "five cents", maybe from the same die: Position of the S looks good, but the shape of the S is different between the two ebay coins and the OP coin. Not the curvature of the bottom of the S and the serifs.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
97 Posts |
I agree with Smauggie- I noted the odd shape of the mint mark and it does look like the metal around the mint mark may have been tampered with. I would get it authenticated and slabbed by PCGS or NGC.
|
|
Valued Member
 Bulgaria
474 Posts |
Yes, "S" is different maybe, but I don't see deformation around mintmark, this is just photo-effect. It looks normal surface under the magnifying glass. This I another picture:  (Today, it was sent to a PCGS dealer.) 
Edited by bobo13 07/19/2017 10:59 am
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
Good ,let us know what the verdict was . 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Good decision. 
|
|
Valued Member
United States
97 Posts |
Looking forward to the outcome. If it is authentic it is a great looking coin IMHO!
|
|
Moderator
 United States
189340 Posts |
Quote: Today, it was sent to a PCGS dealer. I hope the result is good news.  
|
| |
Replies: 34 / Views: 5,167 |