Rather than go through the hassle of a freedom of information act request, I would be nice if the mint would just have a way to submit questions. Obviously, most wouldn't be worthy of replies being posted, but ones like this certainly would.
To be fair, it looks like they made a standardized package design that will carry across all the reverse proof products. I'd rather they take more time and get it right the first time so there is consistency.
Quote: ...would be nice if the mint would just have a way to submit questions. Obviously, most wouldn't be worthy of replies being posted, but ones like this certainly would.
You can. Just use the contact form. It depends on the question whether a FOIA request or a question via this form might be more appropriate.
If the staff they have answering questions submited through that venue have the same responsibility to respond and the same capacity to research I would agree, however working in government I doubt that is the case.
I'd just assume that all coins/medals get over-produced for cases such as this. Especially those that have mintage limits. 30% does seem on the high end but the explanation seems reasonable.
Quote: To be fair, it looks like they made a standardized package design that will carry across all the reverse proof products. I'd rather they take more time and get it right the first time so there is consistency.
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited. Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use