It is both, they cross reference, if you look at the bottom of each listing, the one I provided and the one tropicalbats provided. I did overlook the cross reference though, thanks tropicalbats.
I can see that it is a Retained Cud, but can only assume it is also a RIDB as those die cracks are partially obscured by wear. It's one of those chicken or the egg kind of things, where the question is whether the Retained Cud came first, the RIDB came first, or are they both from the same event. Could be the die break has yet to fully form, or maybe it was fully formed before the Retained Cud. Either way, my comment was to note that it is, for certain, a Retained Cud and thus that ANACS got it right.
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited. Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use