| Author |
Replies: 24 / Views: 4,910 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
The problem is the weight - only about half of a genuine silver half.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
 Hmm , this is strange !
|
|
Moderator
 United States
34402 Posts |
After enlarging and enhancing the edge pic, it kinda looks to me like I see a circumferential line. Could this be an Aluminum casting? If you have access to a SEM at a local university (or even a Precious Metal Analyzer at a local pawn shop), that might help us get closer to an answer. 
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push." -----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed." -----King Adz
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
24885 Posts |
1952 Franklin half dollarLiberty Bell Metal Silver (.900) Weight 12.5 g Diameter 30.6 mm Thickness 2.15 mm This coin :    **  
Edited by Dorado 11/12/2018 10:04 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
366 Posts |
there is just something "off" about the coin - cant quite put my finger on it.
to me it doesn't look real
|
|
Valued Member
United States
265 Posts |
If you look at the space in between "God We" and the bottom of the bust, it looks quite a bit off. Also look at the 'L' in Liberty. Also on the genuine half, he looks to be leaning forward more than the coin in question (where he looks much more up-right).
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2023 Posts |
The entire 1952 image looks slightly rotated clockwise, can't really use that as a direct comparison for "leaning forward". Visually, the 1962 looks genuine to me. What we're missing is a caliper measurement of the thickness or, more easily, a visual side-by-side of the edge with a genuine piece.
The sound test is not proof-positive to me, and I'd otherwise lean towards "the reverse has been planed off" except that nearly half would have to be removed to make this weight and it would then there would be an obvious difference in the thickness. I'm stumped.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
24885 Posts |
Quote: The entire 1952 image looks slightly rotated clockwise, can't really use that as a direct comparison for "leaning forward"  - 
|
|
Valued Member
 Italy
81 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
20753 Posts |
Wonder why people make coins like that.
|
|
Valued Member
299 Posts |
Could be more interesting than a genuine piece ; the master hub for 1960-63 Franklins was reworked after years of gradual deterioration. This looks like a pre-59 Benjamin with hand engraved date (the numerals are improperly shaped) and typical cast copy legends. Perhaps it is uniface as the fakers didn't have a reverse ready - a rare uniface counterfeit die trial/pattern struck in white metal - much more entertaining than a genuine circulated 1962 Half ... thanks for sharing.
Edited by freddo30 11/17/2018 11:59 pm
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
461 Posts |
I completely agree with just carl. Someone must have been REALLY bored.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36741 Posts |
It took some time and effort to destroy that coin.
|
|
New Member
United States
38 Posts |
are we not paying attension (or it just me) in photo 1 @ 2 I see smooth edge. in photo 3@4 I see reminets of reeded edge.
|
|
New Member
United States
38 Posts |
It may be over laid on the kennedy but not sure
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 24 / Views: 4,910 |
Page 2 of 2
|