| Author |
 Replies: 17 / Views: 2,432 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4680 Posts |
That toning makes it difficult to judge surfaces. Based on the way you phrased this, it sounds like it received a numerical grade. Was going to say UNC Details QC. MS-63 if it straight graded.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7028 Posts |
Out of my comfort zone, but since this is an "all skate" AU-55/58...  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6384 Posts |
Looks mint state and the minimal marks are consistent with a 64 grade. The spotty toning is colorful but doesn't look entirely natural. I wouldn't be surprised by a "MS Details, Questionable Toning" judgment.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
461 Posts |
This one is too hard for me. With the heavy toning it is hard to distinguish striking weakness from minimal wear. I'll cover both bases and say either 55-58 or 64-65.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8938 Posts |
I know the answer so I'll hush. I'll just say I'm not a fan of their opinion.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
751 Posts |
Thanks, GrapeCollects. Do you think it is too high or too low? Or that it should have been given a "details" holder?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2334 Posts |
Looks UNC Details (Questionable color)
smat
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6541 Posts |
Lot of marks on that coin MS-62/63  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5668 Posts |
It's hard to see any wear through the toning, so I'll say MS-65, but there appear to be some circulation marks that might drag it down to AU-58.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18662 Posts |
under that toning there are multiple scratches, most on the obverse. MS63
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8938 Posts |
Quote:
Do you think it is too high or too low? Or that it should have been given a "details" holder? I think I'll wait until you reveal so I don't influence others |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
751 Posts |
Here it is! By the way, is PCGS inconsistent on coins of "questionable color?" Or what saves this from the "MS Details" designation?  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8938 Posts |
Now that it's been revealed, I personally grade this AU Details Artificially Toned. I don't think this is MS, nor do I think NT.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4680 Posts |
For as tight as they can be at times with QC and AT, makes you wonder what they saw in hand with the color on this. Agreed with possible AT, I figured minimum QC. I wouldn't disagree with MS-62(obviously, I called it a 63). Also wouldn't have been surprised by AU-58 . |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5668 Posts |
If you average my two guesses, I came pretty close.  . Actually, I wasn't as bothered by the colorful toning. |
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 17 / Views: 2,432 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 12/12/2020 10:46 pm
