| Author |
 Replies: 22 / Views: 418 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7135 Posts |
Since it has a green bean, I'll go with 66+
Sure is a beauty
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
919 Posts |
That's a beautiful WLH. Since it has a CAC sticker (assuming green), I'm going with the holder having a 66+ on it.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1800 Posts |
I'm with @jbuck at MS-66.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
15596 Posts |
It's a beauty for sure.  I'll go MS66 and hope I'm wrong. Take a look at my other hobby ... http://www.jk-dk.art |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1097 Posts |
I will also say MS-66 with the CAC. Beauty.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1510 Posts |
67? Looks good at age 90!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
759 Posts |
Is that die polishing? I will guess PR(66)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1211 Posts |
Interesting only Adam brought up the lines. So the correct answer here is MS66. I am 99% positive the lines on the Obverse are die polishing because both NGC and CAC straight graded. Also when I look at them, the lines stop as soon as they get to the sun rays or liberty. No line cuts through the details of the coin at all. I really like the coin, I also thought it looked MS67. I wonder if NGC/CAC settled on MS66 due to those die polishing lines? Do those sometimes lower the grade if they feel it affects eye appeal? I don't find them distracting however if I saw this coin raw online I would question if they were cleaning lines.
|
|
Moderator
United States
190633 Posts |
Quote:
So the correct answer here is MS66. I was right!  But I wanted to be wrong.  Regarding the lines, I noticed them, but thought they were benign since as you said none of them affected the coin details. It may have affected their grading, although I did not consider them for my own opinion. No matter what, she is still a beauty.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1800 Posts |
100% die polishing lines. I don't think they figure into the grade. There are random ticks that keep it out of 67 territory (66 CAC is great and it certainly is a looker). There is a hit on her elbow and marks in the field above IGWT, specifically above the N in IN and G in God.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1211 Posts |
Stay tuned for another post from me next week with a couple depression era San Fran walkers :)
|
|
Moderator
United States
190633 Posts |
Quote:
Stay tuned for another post from me next week with a couple depression era San Fran walkers :)   |
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18745 Posts |
Quote:
I wonder if NGC/CAC settled on MS66 due to those die polishing lines? they are not considered in the grade. although MS67 is not the highest possible grade. I am surprised it at least did not have a + for strike. is that a CAC bean on that holder? |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7135 Posts |
Quote:
Stay tuned for another post from me next week with a couple depression era San Fran walkers :)  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
919 Posts |
I was perusing Greysheet retail and decided to check this out. MS66 at $435, MS66 CAC at $550, and MS67 at $1,250.00. With that sort of jump, I'm sure the graders are looking really hard before giving out 67s.
Still a gorgeous Walker!
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 22 / Views: 418 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 07/14/2026 2:42 pm
