Author |
Replies: 14 / Views: 406 |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
24571 Posts |
What do you feel this one will grade?  
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9119 Posts |
|
Bedrock of the Community

United States
70371 Posts |
Pics are really too dark to see surface details clearly. 
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1512 Posts |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2276 Posts |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2887 Posts |
It's a bit tough to see the fields in the pics. If the scratch west of the nose and the ding between the date and the lower hair curls aren't too bad, this looks MS-64.
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
720 Posts |
It's hiding in the shadows like Batman.
It does have potential for a 64, at best
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12584 Posts |
for the 81(P) the reverse should be a little stronger. again, light shadowing across the cheek is not helping. non-directional lighting would help. all your recent photos have this issue.
i dont think its higher than MS63+ or MS64
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
1001 Posts |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
24571 Posts |
I'm experimenting with lighting to try to get a better shot of surface marks. Hopefully this gives a better idea of what the coin looks like.  
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2074 Posts |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2887 Posts |
Looking at the new pics, I think it goes MS-63/63+. Possible PL, but I can't get a good feel for the depth of reflection in the fields. With the coin in hand, you have a better feel for that.
|
Bedrock of the Community

United States
70371 Posts |
|
Valued Member
United States
253 Posts |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4658 Posts |
Looks 64 to me. Great luster and only light marks.
|
|
Replies: 14 / Views: 406 |
|