Coin Community Family of Web Sites Live Coin auctions starting as low as $1
Like us on Facebook! Subscribe to our Youtube Channel! Check out our Twitter! Check out our Pinterest!
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.
Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some coins?
Our coin forum is completely free! Register Now!

1913 T1 Buffalo. Error Or PMD?

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 10 / Views: 758Next Topic  
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
United States
4462 Posts
 Posted 02/06/2023  8:15 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add Ty2020b to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Picked this one up recently just to get it in hand, found it intriguing. Shared it with a few CCF'ers offline, and we're a bit divided on mint made error, or PMD. Thoughts and opinions welcome!

I lean error. Possibly detached reverse lam pre strike, cussing the obverse weakness (dip) seen. There is also subtle blakesley effect, more prominent on the obverse, which I didn't capture well in the photos. Or a possible small clip?

Or just PMD?





Pillar of the Community
United States
2498 Posts
 Posted 02/06/2023  8:16 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jessvc1 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
looks like a rim clip
Bedrock of the Community
Learn More...
United States
76505 Posts
 Posted 02/06/2023  8:24 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Coinfrog to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Why do you think this is a rim clip?
Pillar of the Community
United States
2498 Posts
 Posted 02/06/2023  8:38 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jessvc1 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
almost looks like one but your guess is as good as mine we dont know the history of this coin could be just a hit from a hammer who knows
Bedrock of the Community
Learn More...
United States
76505 Posts
 Posted 02/06/2023  8:45 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Coinfrog to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Debatable. As it stands, I think it detracts from the coin.
Bedrock of the Community
Learn More...
United States
15651 Posts
Pillar of the Community
United States
2339 Posts
 Posted 02/07/2023  5:13 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add mikediamond to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I was asked for my opinion. It's not an easy call. Tell me, is the straight internal edge of the sloping deficit raised or flat? Also, does the field rise to meet the straight edge? An affirmative answer to either question would indicate that this is post-strike damage.
Error coin writer and researcher.
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
United States
4462 Posts
 Posted 02/07/2023  10:07 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Ty2020b to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks Mike. Having a bit of a hard time really grasping which you're referring to. The internal edge of the straight area is the high point, but still sits below the surface of the rim.

Not sure if any of these help, quick phone pics with the loupe.



Pillar of the Community
United States
2339 Posts
 Posted 02/07/2023  10:41 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add mikediamond to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I am unable to determine if this is a genuine planchet defect or post-strike damage. There is evidence supporting both positions. I would have to examine it carefully under magnification.
Error coin writer and researcher.
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
United States
4462 Posts
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
United States
4462 Posts
 Posted 02/18/2023  09:16 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Ty2020b to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Sent this one off to Mike Diamond for an in hand look. For those curious, here is his analysis:


Quote:
Your Buffalo nickel arrived yesterday. I took a look at it and cannot arrive at a definitive conclusion regarding the authenticity of the defect. However, I lean toward post-strike damage, for three reasons. First, I see no metal flow in the bison's tail where it borders the sloping surface. Second, radial flow lines show no change as they approach the sloping surface. These would be affected by metal flow as well. Third, the concave field terminates too abruptly when it meets the sloping surface at 3:00 on the reverse face. If this defect was present before the strike, the junction between field and defect would be less sharply defined.
  Previous TopicReplies: 10 / Views: 758Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.





Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2023 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2023 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.4 seconds to rattle this change. Powered By: