| Author |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,082 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
270 Posts |
It has been a while since my last post... Let's just say, "tough times" and leave it at that... Anyway, I came across this obvious counterfeit coin and knew exactly what I had to do next to find out more. I think it is a VERY crude - though one of a kind - example of an 18th century contemporary counterfeit Irish halfpenny. The King George II (?) portrait is buffoonish. The writing on the reverse, including the date (1737 ?) is not only more buffoonery, it is in mirror image (I think), as if the counterfeiter didn't realize how his struck image would appear before he struck it. The weight is 8.31 grams! That's about all I got - or think I got. Would LOVE to hear the thoughts of this forum's experts, even if it is just to confirm what I am thinking so far.   Edited by jdsstrat 09/04/2026 07:12 am
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
270 Posts |
P.S. I am posting in this sub-forum because I understand that many coins like this made their way to the colonies circa 1737, if they weren't in fact made here.
P.P.S. I am not entirely convinced that the 3 of 1737 is a 3. It may be an 8 of 1787. What do you think?
P.P.P.S. The diameter is a hair over 30 mm.
Edited by jdsstrat 09/04/2026 10:55 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
6850 Posts |
Why is the date backwards?
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
270 Posts |
I was hoping someone at this forum would be able to answer that somewhat definitively. I can only speculate.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
270 Posts |
After a few more deep dives of my own, I thought it would make sense to update my last post. So here it goes... I am looking for some assistance identifying and potentially finding a catalog variety number (Vlack, Atkins, etc.) for an apparent contemporary counterfeit copper coin I have in my possession. It appears to be an exceptionally crude, blundered-die variety from the post-Revolutionary War era. I say "blundered" because the entire inscription and date on the reverse side is completely retrograde, as in mirror-imaged. It is clearly the work of an amateur. The crudely cartoonish King George III portrait on the obverse is also, I believe, in mirror image, and is of the "two eyeballs" error kind, where two separate eye profiles are stacked next to each other. Additionally and upon further review, the coin appears to be a contemporary cast piece rather than struck. There is a clear, unfiled casting sprue/gate remnant protruding from the rim, along with a corresponding soft molding flash line around the edge. Given the 1787 date, specifications (i.e., 8.31 grams, slightly more than 30mm diameter), and extreme crudity, I wonder if this coin can be linked to the kinds of clandestine operations that were rampant during the 1787 currency crisis. Or, perhaps, to American/Canadian Blacksmith style issues. Has anyone seen this exact "two eyeball" obverse paired with the mirrored 1787 Hibernia reverse before? Any catalog references or insights in general would be GREATLY appreciated!    
|
|
Moderator
 United States
106214 Posts |
wow "Cartoonish" is right of George. I hope someone can answer your questions.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
6850 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
195203 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
270 Posts |
Thanks for the merge! Makes ¢.
BTW: I am not entirely sold on this being a product of a cast counterfeiting process, either. I have been reading that crudely made planchets will sometimes exhibit characteristics that make them appear as having been cast.
Thoughts?
Edited by jdsstrat 09/09/2026 2:55 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1760 Posts |
John Lorenzo is currently investigating or should I say ... thanks for the alert! Having some experts currently reviewing this example. An extraordinary piece. HIBERNIA in retrograde. It seems to belong to the Wood 38 Blacksmith group but its crudeness is even beyond the current varieties in this Wood # IMO (see my book Forgotten Coins) - Jeff Rock is taking the lead here since IMO he is the current world authority on counterfeit Irish. Allow several days ... never seen this piece before either obverse or reverse.
Edited by colonialjohn 09/08/2026 11:42 pm
|
|
Moderator
 United States
195203 Posts |
Quote: Thanks for the merge! Makes ¢. My pleasure. 
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
270 Posts |
Thank you, John. I look forward to hearing back from you. BTW, the webmaster at C4 has put me in contact with Jeff, who has recommended a few books to get me started on my own. Apparently, I have a LOT of catching up to do :)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3514 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1760 Posts |
I am sure Jeff Rock got back to you to start researching this piece. You could post exactly where you got this piece. This would help possibly in its attribution. Some believe it could be a modern concoction piece such as from MARIO a 20thC forger who produced many pieces. Still under investigation. Never seen this piece anywhere ... not in any die charts for Irish 18thC counterfeits by C4 or any listed counterfeit under Canadian cataloging as in the Blacksmiths. As of today it remains an enigma. To be continued ... supply your transaction person. Pedigree can help ... here. JPL
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
270 Posts |
Some background... This coin came from my grandfather who had a coin and stamp shop in Eastchester then White Plains NY in the 1960s. He was Joseph, the place was called Eastchester Coin and Stamp, and he ran it with his brother, Bobby. Leftover stock passed to my mother and aunt. In the last year or so, I have begun the process of sorting through it. There have been other pieces I have posted here, an eclectic assortment if I do say so myself, including but not at all limited to other counterfeit pieces. Yes, I have been in touch with Jeff, who has recommended a variety of resources to help me sort. He has also recommended the C4 convention in November, which may be problematic for me because of prior commitments.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1760 Posts |
There is a gathering of collectors soon of a C4 background I will pass the picture around of this item and possibly showcase the item in person at this gathering of 50 or so C4 collectors. Its October 3. However its UNIQUE for both its obverse and its reverse and I can say it matches NOTHING in the current existence of a Canadian Blacksmith types with some hints to Wood 38 but much more crude and different or an 18thC Irish 1/2d or 1/4d. This is not bad nor good its a question now "When/where was it possibly made? Lately I have been doing SEM/EDS combined with XRF analysis perhaps you may consider me doing some analyses with this piece to see if the trace elements are representative of something made in the 18thC. See this article in the Newman Numismatic Portal of a similar matter in which regal die 2 Reales of a base alloy were found and what are their meaning and consequences - https://nnp.washu.edu/Documents/Det...oach/1335840. After hand inspection I can judge to see if its worthy spending several hundred dollars to have it analyze at Michigan State University with SEM/EDS with a free XRF pre-screen from an associate of mine. This takes several months for SEM/EDS and 2-3 weeks for XRF since its flown from NJ out to the west coast. Let me know if you decide to go ahead. We would do a quick XRF first then tear it apart (so to speak) after October 3 showcase with SEM/EDS if justified. John Lorenzo P.S. You can see my other SEM/EDS studies by putting the term SEM/EDS in the Search venue box at the Newman Portal the latest being why do Jefferson nickels of the WWII era laminate with such a high frequency?
Edited by colonialjohn Today 3H 41M ago
|
| |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,082 |
|