First Page
Posted Yesterday 12:09 pm
Quote:
I agree JBuck and 100% with HGK3. (Floating Roofs/No FG are not my cup of tea either.) It is a variety though.
I agree JBuck and 100% with HGK3. (Floating Roofs/No FG are not my cup of tea either.) It is a variety though.
I also agree with jbuck that it is not a variety and would be a good idea to keep one as an example for reference -
Quote:
I agree, but you can label and keep it as an example.
I agree, but you can label and keep it as an example.
Petespockets55,
I always am trying to learn but I have some questions.
Are you saying that every different year and mm that has this over die polishing are each individually separate varieties? as far as I know these occur from the mid 60s to early 70s. Maybe outside of that range as well.
If the answer is yes, where can I find listings of these many variety listings so that I may identify them properly? I would assume that every die pair that has this issue would be a separate variety?
Quote:
Varieties deviate from a "normal" coin made by the mint and have multiple examples of the same die pair.
Varieties deviate from a "normal" coin made by the mint and have multiple examples of the same die pair.
By this broad definition would every cent that has a die chip, gouge, or crack also be considered a separate variety? That just does not seem right. I recently sent in a 1969S LMC that I thought might be a new DDR variety to an attributor that you all know. I was told it was just a die gouge and not a variety. Please help me understand your position more clearly.
Edited by FsdWarp10
Yesterday 7:43 pm
Yesterday 7:43 pm
