. And yet again shows the inconsistency of TPG's. Technically speaking, the rim issue happened/was caused pre strike or during strike, not post strike, this shouldn't affect the grade (except in eye appeal, if said grader/graders choose to do so).
1918-d had problematic strikes. IMO, yours exhibits a striking issue. Heck, the PCGS plate coin @MS67 has weakly formed rims not unlike this one. If the 18-d was known to be well struck, I could see this affecting the grade more drastically, but it's not.
Bottom line.. PCGS saw something we didn't or they decided to grade a bit harsh. It's all just an opinion. Play the crack out game again. You may pull another MS62 or you may pull the 64.you're at the mercy of someone else's opinion.
MS 62 is not merited, in my opinion. I would much much rather have this coin in my dansco than a lot of 64s I have seen over the year. If it were not for the rim, I think I might have gone for a 65. I really liked this coin!
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited. Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use