Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall 300,000 items to help build your collection! Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Specializing in Modern Numismatics Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsJoin Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

What Happens To Gold And Silver Next? Look Out Below?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 5,649 / Views: 461,083Next Topic
Page: of 377
Pillar of the Community
United States
3789 Posts
 Posted 08/17/2013  3:00 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add yup7676 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
@CTguy

This is kind of a two parter here to answer.

First of all lets tackle the gaps in price.

We find gaps in either upward or downward price movement. They happen right at the opening session for whatever asset we are talking about, in this case commodities, tho gaps happen in currencies, stocks, bonds etc. These gaps usually happen during some sort of price movement thats already been happening or sometimes they happen suddenly. In any case, they happen right at the beginning of the trading session.

As an example, XYZ stock has been rising for a good week, from Monday to Thursday. Friday AM rolls around and before the open, in the pre-market XYX is indicated to open up say, 5 pts from its last closing price on Thursday. This is a gap up in price. The closing price on Thursday was 50 dollars. The 5 dollar move up is the gap up. On a normal day, XYX stock would be up a mere .60 cents, yet Friday morning we see it opens right up at 55 dollars. That is a gap up. This same illustration could be done in the reverse, as the prices moves lower.


These gaps as I said, go in either direction, up or down. In a gap, there is sizable selling or buying. Many times and depending on market conditions, gaps are unstable, that is they don't hold. Other times, gaps hold and don't get filled. Again, this can work whether the gap is down or up in price.

So gaps are a very important time line in an asset. It must be either overcome with buying or selling. Filling gaps can give us clues as to how strong or weak an asset is. Therefore, if you are looking for higher prices, you want to see gaps filled and closed. If you are looking for lower prices, you want gaps to unravel and not fill. Just as a gap produces technical damage in price it can also help set the stage for further price appreciation.

So the context is also important as to where in time and price this gap happens. Some assets gap higher and never look back, making yearly highs. That is an extremely strong asset that's being bought up and has excellent support from buyers.

Some assets gap down and proceed to make fresh yearly lows. Thats telling us its being dumped wholesale and no fund wants it.

Now, some gaps get filled within an assets move, and they dont happen or cause yearly lows or yearly highs. Thats what we are seeing in gold and silver. These gaps it had are being retraced and filled. The gaps were filled on rather light volume. ... and I will get to volume in a bit and its importance.

So gaps are key to getting some sort of stabilizing in an asset. getting them to stick and hold is important, it gives us clues as to whats happening or could happen.

Now lets talk about volume. This is a tricky tricky tricky subject. To me, volume IS super important. I prefer to see moves done, either in buying or selling, with a ton of volume. That volume represents the buyers and sellers and the commitment that they are showing. It tells us how strong they want or dont want an asset.

Major inflection points happen with volume. Yet, and to confuse everyone completely, I will say I have partaken in major moves solely by going with price and not volume. There are times when assets either go higher or lower without volume, all you see is the price action and you guide yourself by it.

Why is this? I really have no clue. I don't dwell much time on asking or looking at why. I have a set of rules and scenarios that are really way too lengthy and complex to discuss here but those I have learned from years of observing. Basically however, I always go with price FIRST. Then I go with volume as a secondary measure. I also take into consideration what time of the year it is, what kind of asset it is I am trading and its behavior in the past and present.

So this rise we saw in filling the gaps in gold and silver, first I respect the price action. Clearly its moving up. It has filled some gaps, and done it with low volume. Low volume, to me, doesn't really give a lot of confidence but I do respect the price action which has been strong enough to fill the gaps and keep moving. Thus far, its held and not rolled over.

Lets wrap up since this was rather lengthy and just highlight again the key points. In an updated post I'll discuss the current price action

1- Gaps are important points in an asset

2- Gaps occur either in an upward or downward fashion. They can occur at highly years, yearly lows.

3- Gaps can be filled, or unravel, that is the gap doesn't get filled and the price action goes below the initial gap.

4- A retracement of price can include filling the gaps. Sometimes seeing gaps get filled as price rises can give us clues as to whether an asset is trying to stablize.

5- Volume is important. However-
a- what type asset is this
b- how has it acted in the past
c- what period in time are we, when this asset is moving.
d- for some time now as of recent, moves in the market have happened on lower volume.
e- volume is important because it tells us how much or how little funds want an certain asset.
f- volume can help in determining if an assets move is crediable and if it will stick or if its weak and will give up its move later on.

I hope that answers the guestions on gaps and a little on volume.
Valued Member
JSH's Avatar
United States
410 Posts
 Posted 08/17/2013  7:50 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add JSH to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
I disagree. Production costs alone can only go up for many reasons and $20 silver won't cut it for ever.
The present gold/silver ratio bothers me to no end. Whatever the price of gold you think it should be,
divide that by 15 and there's your normal price for silver. 60-65oz silver to 1oz gold is ridiculous.
It's a recent phenomenon compared to their entire history as money.


Production costs have nothing to do with commodity prices. Producers don't set prices, the market does. It is no different than corn. A corn farmer plants a crop and has no idea what he will get for it come harvest time. It doesn't matter how much he spent producing his crop, when it comes time to sell he gets whatever the market is willing to pay at auction. Most don't have the savings to refuse to sell because they have debts to pay. If prices stay low, the inefficient producers go out of business and the efficient producers take over.

Silver is no different than growing corn. There is not one production cost, every producer has a different cost. Some are more efficient than others. If prices stay low too long the inefficient producers get bought up by the efficient producers. The big difference between corn and silver is a lot of silver production is a byproduct of mining for other industrial metals like copper, tin, zinc, etc. The silver is a bonus for a copper producer and they are happy to sell it for whatever the market will pay. They do not hold it off the market hoping for better prices because just like a corn farmer, miners don't have the cash flow to sit on product, they have bills to pay.

As to the whole gold / silver ratio, gold and silver are not money and they don't have a set ratio anymore like when they were money. Gold and silver are separate commodities that trade independently. Even if you believe in gold / silver ratios the large ratio don't mean that silver is valued too low. The thing about ratios is that both numbers are variable and gold can just as easily be too high as silver too low. I personally believe that gold is overvalued and will continue to fall.
Pillar of the Community
United States
1554 Posts
 Posted 08/17/2013  9:10 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add 1893S to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I totally agree with you JSH, except for one thing. Corn can be planted year after year and is not a commodity that is finite. I hope I made sense there....I usually get yelled at on this forum for my opinions but I truly believe that Silver prices are being manipulated for some reason and that Silver is totally undervalued for some reason. I know that a commodity is worth what the going price is but I'm just sayin'....
Bedrock of the Community
basebal21's Avatar
13014 Posts
 Posted 08/17/2013  9:43 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add basebal21 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Corn can be planted year after year and is not a commodity that is finite


Everything is finite to an extent. There may be a limit to how much silver could possibly exist, but it doesn't mean where anywhere close to that. Oil is finite too but we wont be running out of that in our lifetimes barring some massive wells exploding
Pillar of the Community
United States
3789 Posts
 Posted 08/17/2013  10:05 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add yup7676 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Usually when people try to complicate things and make it complex, its because they are having a hard time understanding how things work.

In the case of commodities, all of them from silver, to corn, to cocoa to cotton, commodities are all about supply and demand.

So obvious, no matter what anyone ways, right now, supply of silver and gold are overwhelming any sort of demand.

There is no manipulation.
Valued Member
JSH's Avatar
United States
410 Posts
 Posted 08/18/2013  09:31 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add JSH to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Miggs: You make perfect sense, but as baseball pointed out, you are forgetting scarcity. I see no indication that silver is getting hard to find or running out. It is also a bit of a hybrid. It is not renewable like corn but it is not consumed like oil. Most of the silver that comes out of mines simply changes from form to form meaning that the supply above ground continues to grow over time. That supply has grown very quickly recently due to record prices and mining operations going into high gear to capitalize on that high price. Of course that huge increase in supply eventually will overwhelm demand and the price crashes.

Yup: I don't see people turning to complexity and conspiracy as necessarily a lack of understanding on how things work. I usually see it as a response to a deeply held belief and the more a person is personally and financially invested in an idea, the more likely they are to turn to conspiracy theories to explain why their belief isn't playing out. I've seen it in a variety of people and a variety of "beliefs" whether they be Y2K, peak oil, the collapse of the dollar and the rise of gold as money, Facebook stock price, etc. Facebook going public was a humorous example. I have friends that love Facebook and rushed out to buy FB when it went public just knowing that it was the next Apple and was going to make them rich. They were shocked and amazed when the stock price dropped like a rock and the explanations got crazier and crazier with some turning to conspiracies involving Apple, Microsoft, and Google trying to keep Facebook from world domination.
Pillar of the Community
Namachieli's Avatar
United States
2120 Posts
 Posted 08/18/2013  12:58 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Namachieli to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Most people make that point, that to hit the ratio silver has to go up...

or... Gold has to come down. Silver could just stay put.
Edited by Namachieli
08/18/2013 12:58 pm
Valued Member
United States
95 Posts
 Posted 08/19/2013  08:47 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add ctguy to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
yup7676

I hope that answers the guestions on gaps and a little on volume.


Yes it does, Thank You for taking the time.
Valued Member
miggs's Avatar
Canada
281 Posts
 Posted 08/19/2013  10:49 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add miggs to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
I see no indication that silver is getting hard to find or running out.../that the supply above ground continues to grow over time

Silver might not be hard to find right now but IF you're to trust the USGS who claims silver will be the 1st element in the periodic table to go extinct in about 7 years,
silver is looking pretty good to me. I don't believe there's only 7 years left but even if its 20 years, that's like tomorrow...

And the fact that the silver markets aren't reacting to this in any way, fuels the conspiracy theorists that much more. Maybe they're saving it for some near future panic buying?
I fantasize of the day when algorithms and HFT won't be a factor in the (true) price discovery of silver because a real free commodity market is all about supply and demand.

My issue with the gold/silver ratio is solely based on the actual "mining" ratio which is 9 to 1.

Although I like gold, I love silver much more. Practically all the gold ever mined is still just sitting somewhere. Where as silver is being used up endlessly by industries
and not efficiently or completely recycled yet. I drink colloidal silver everyday and that's gone forever (and no, I'm not blue in the face lol)

Again IF you're to believe the USGS, silver reserves are dwindling fast, they're at their lowest levels in the last 200 years. If that's a conspiracy theory, it's not coming from the usual sources.



Pillar of the Community
United States
1590 Posts
 Posted 08/19/2013  11:20 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jmkendall to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I haven't heard of the USGS statement, but I have no doubt you have read it. But for me, well, I remember the 70s when ALL the experts were telling us we would run out of oil in 20 years, or by the end of the Century...FOR SURE.

Now we're 13 years past the end point and we hear that between the new discoveries in the Continental US and the Alaska/Siberian known reserves, we have more oil than was thought to exist in the Gulf when they started 100 years ago.

Things change. No one has a Star Trek Scanner and can tell us how much of any metal or mineral is in the planet.

That doesn't even include the potential in Asteroid mining, or Lunar mining. These things will happen. Not might, will. The only variable is time.

I'm a retired Engineer. I read where the technology to extract gold from seawater is viable at $3500/oz. Which means that no matter what your top end is never going to be more than $5000/oz for gold. And that doesn't include the fact that the market will cap it way below that because of demand destruction.

Something we are already seeing. When we drop the price, demand goes up, which prompts the "smart money" to plow into the market and drive the price up; anticipating more demand. The physical buyers seeing the price go up, exit the market. And the cycle continues
Bedrock of the Community
basebal21's Avatar
13014 Posts
 Posted 08/19/2013  12:29 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add basebal21 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Again IF you're to believe the USGS, silver reserves are dwindling fast, they're at their lowest levels in the last 200 years. If that's a conspiracy theory, it's not coming from the usual sources.


I dont believe them at all. Between oil running out, the next ice age coming, the whole in the o zone going to burn us all up, then global warming ect theres a very long history for whatever reason of these were running out or life and we know it is completely changed predictions. The hype around that was supposedly from 2008 but theres nothing on the actual USGS website about it. http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/p...13-silve.pdf thats their 2013 report and my skimming didnt see anything about it either.

Max Keiser seems to be the driving force behind this rumor, the guy isn't someone I would want to be associated with. Hes made a career off trying to destroy companies profiting off them. More specifically shorting stock for companies susceptible to environmental groups like McDonalds and using some of the profit to fund the protests in an attempt to drive the stock price lower. His newest project is he seems to think hes going to crash JP Morgan telling people to buy silver. When hes the only source of some supposed secret I couldnt care less what it supposedly is.

Regardless of all of that the simplest way to know what may or may not be true is just watch the government. They arent going to get caught with their pants down needing it for electronics still which makes it national security. If we were down to the last drops they would take mines for themselves, they havent. As for everyone else there would still be a massive above ground supply being turned over from what gets smelted every year
Valued Member
miggs's Avatar
Canada
281 Posts
 Posted 08/19/2013  12:56 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add miggs to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I totally agree with you about Keiser
But I didn't mentioned nor quoted him. You're also right about the government but by the time they act
and if we haven't seen it coming, it's too late. I think Bolivia wants to nationalize its silver mines which could have a snowball effect?
The following articles are about the supposed diminishing supply;
http://www.bbc.com/future/story/201...ilver-bullet
http://www.scientificamerican.com/a...much-is-left
Pillar of the Community
United States
3789 Posts
 Posted 08/19/2013  1:20 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add yup7676 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
couple of items-

notice gold and silver getting rejected here. Nothing really big and to be expected. There is a fair amount of price resistnace in this area so I would expect a lot of chop and bump in the coming days.

I also want to state this- if you are fearing that gold and silver left without you, please dont. They are STILL in a downtrend. They are not blasting off to the moon. We still have a long way to find out what happens with gold and silver and August will not be the kind of month that will give us straight forward answers.

I see this price action as a retracement and thats it. It should be expected. There will be trades to be made on this move. If you were fretting about not selling some gold and silver months ago after it dumped, this is a probably a good place to think about it and raise cash if you had remorse over not making some cash. Sell some into rising prices, never hurts to make some money and profit.

As far as silver shortage. If there was such a thing, the market would have sniffed that out a longgggg time ago. Silver would go crazy price wise. But that hasnt happened because we have a glut of silver.
Valued Member
shootnstarz's Avatar
United States
477 Posts
 Posted 08/19/2013  1:26 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add shootnstarz to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Well, since all silver was created inside supernovas it is still being produced every time one goes off, though mostly in other galaxies. This is good, you don't want to be too close to one.

I agree that astromining is inevitable, not so much to return to Earth but for construction in space and other planets. I've actually been working on an outline for a fiction book about such, not that I'll ever get it written but it's fun to speculate on how it will come to be, what power sources for refineries will be used and how to go about actually mining the materials.

I've envisioned an orbiting refinery that uses the Sun and a sort of giant magnifying glass for melting and processing the material. Or this factory could be placed on the Moon with even better results. The possibilities are limitless.

Rick
Edited by shootnstarz
08/19/2013 1:32 pm
Bedrock of the Community
basebal21's Avatar
13014 Posts
 Posted 08/19/2013  1:33 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add basebal21 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
I totally agree with you about Keiser
But I didn't mentioned nor quoted him. You're also right about the government but by the time they act
and if we haven't seen it coming, it's too late.


I wasnt sure if you were or not Keiser just kept popping up left and right when I was trying to google it to find out more, maybe I had the wrong search term but everything I clicked was him. There arent a lot of financial people that really tick me off since usually its just business but what he does isn't business. I hate people that try and actively profit on others theyre actively trying to create.


Quote:
I think Bolivia wants to nationalize its silver mines which could have a snowball effect?


I dont think Bolivia will have a snowball effect just like there wasnt one when Venezuela nationalized their oil industry. Some other small or dictatorship type countries may do the same but countries like that are just going to do what they want to do. I suspect their desire is much more profit driven than anything after they saw the profit flowing in the last few years.


Quote:
The following articles are about the supposed diminishing supply;


The scientific one seems more reason for silver at least saying decades left. It was a bit doom and gloom overall and seemed to be focusing on the scientists who were from a singular ideological sect of the community. My problem with predictions that are decades away is theres to many variables and 99 percent of the past ones have proven to be wrong. I dont doubt that one day we will run out, I dont think it will be any time soon though. Technology is constantly improving allowing us to get more and find more of things. I'm not even talking about asteroid mining or anything like that but just what we can get from the mines themselves or finding new mines we didnt know about.

Personally I hate how scientists sometimes pretend like they know everything with these predictions. It just reeks of hubris when theres so much about the earth and what it contains we dont know. With their track record I need to see more than just their prediction and be closer to the date to buy into. For all we know 40 years from now well be making silver in labs like we can with diamonds or prices will come down and people will lose some interest lessening demand. At some point I'm sure silver in band-aids and even electronics will start to get replaced by something newer and cheaper especially if we do start to run low on supply. Theres just to many variables for me at this point.
Edited by basebal21
08/19/2013 1:35 pm
  Previous TopicReplies: 5,649 / Views: 461,083Next Topic
Page: of 377

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.56 seconds to rattle this change. Forums