| Author |
Replies: 17 / Views: 623 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7192 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3471 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7620 Posts |
Proof 66 from these old and tired eyes of mine. Lovely coin.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19159 Posts |
Very nice piece. Yes, I'm with PR66 as well.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18668 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
579 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
74254 Posts |
I'll say PR-66.
Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
96270 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19952 Posts |
PR-64
Lincoln Cent Lover!VERDI-CARE™ INVENTOR https://verdi.care/
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7036 Posts |
PR-65cam....maybe 66, as we all know always hard to grade proof from photos..
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7036 Posts |
muddler must be on vacation..... 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
10547 Posts |
I'd go PF65 (maybe 66) - Not cameo
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7192 Posts |
This was the second to last Franklyn I added to my proof cameo set. He is graded by PCGS as proof 66 cameo and has a CAC sticker too. Sorry my photographs do not present the cameo as well as it is. 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18668 Posts |
I'm not the best with grading proofs. I dont own any except 2 proof sets but I'm not sure how this pulls a 66 with a bean seeing the field disturbances on the obv fields at K2 and K8. maybe someone can enlighten me if this is on the coin what caused it and why wouldnt it affect the grade. I dropped it a full grade for this.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7192 Posts |
@panzaldi, the graininess noted may be due to photography enhancements from my computer. The coin it's self does not have this pitting look to it.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18668 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 17 / Views: 623 |