Sorry, I forgot to share the actual grade. PCGS called it MS(60). I thought it was strange because the surfaces didn't look that much more abraded than a 61/62. It seems that many of you think this is an AU coin, though.
Thanks everyone. Where do you see the wear that makes it AU in your eyes? Jacrispies--interesting assessment, why do you say 60 (with the implication that it doesn't really deserve MS)?
I am curious what you all think of this coin--it is not my coin, so I have to go by the dealer's photos. I know the holder looks pretty beat up, but the second picture of the obverse also seems to show some hairlines--I think they are the coin itself.
What do you think of this example in terms of how it should be graded? And what do you think about it overall as a coin?
We had only three specific guesses on this one, and all agreed on MS(63). NGC called this MS(62), and CAC agreed enough to give it a green bean. Sorry for the poor quality of this old photo of the slab.
I think the third digit is a 1. It could only be 1811 or 1814. Those are the only two dates from 1810 to 1819 when the US mint struck dimes. I would guess 1814 because it is more common, and because all 1811 dimes have the 1811/09 overdate.
@sel_69l: Thanks! The bottom pictures are True View pics from PCGS. The pictures are from my camera through the "plastic tomb." @Hondo Boguss: Thanks for offering yourself up as the sacrificial lamb. @echidna: Thanks for the grade. I will reveal what PCGS said tomorrow. I love the PL look on this coin (the obverse more than the reverse).
Another one in my series of US gold type coins (very, very far being complete): I present my 1929 Indian Quarter Eagle. It's from the onset of the Great Depression (and the birth year of both Anne Frank and Dick Clark), and I like the colors on it. It may not come out in these pictures, but there is some cool looking toning on it.
This is other coin I had in an NGC holder with a green bean and reholdered as CACG.
I am NOT great at grading things once we get above 64. I noticed most of you would have graded this 64, and we even got one vote for 62. Do you think PCGS and CAC got this one wrong? The scratches are few, but there are those two sizable ones in the obverse field, as well as a couple of hits on Liberty's shin.
Thanks @BH1964. I understand this is a CACG holder--I had it crossed from an NGC holder with the green bean to this one (the NGC one was in bad condition--and I can fit two CACG holders on the edges of my PCGS box).
To be clear, you see this coin as overgraded, right? Do you see it as an AU(58) that mistakenly got in to an MS(61) holder?