undergraded imo. VF30 at worst. you do have to take into consideration that TPG's grade by value based on what they feel a coin may sell for. sometimes you will see a coin net graded down for eye appeal or even minor issues that would not warrant the higher grade. looking at the overall coin it may have been marked down a notch as it most likely would not be able to demand VF30 price
Quote: Does anyone else get artificial toning vibes from this one?
there is a toning progression for silver
Yellow (gold) Brown (an advanced yellow) Blue Red Green Purple Black
you can see this color progression on surfaces of this coin and therefore natural. most AT coins tend to be more blotchy with hard lines between the colors and/or the toning appears to be superficial like you could scrape it off the surface. the toning on this one has smooth transition between colors.
CCF likes to see only one coin per thread. you will get way less responses when placing multiple coins in a thread. I dont do multiple coins in a thread but looking at the ones you posted the CC morgans would most likely be the only ones I would consider.
the 81CC looks MS63
something to help with considering having a coin graded.
two reasons to slab 1. its a rare coin that needs authenticated and preserved 2. you are planning on selling the coin and the cost of acquisition plus the grading fee's would warrant it without chewing up all your profit
PCGS charges a minimum of $69 for a subscription other subscription levels include grading vouchers though so you could reduce these costs. add to the subscription cost, per coin grading cost which are $23 plus shipping & ins both ways (1-4 coins is $27 if the total value is under $1000)
NGC - economy grading tier is $22, plus $10 handling fee, plus $28 for shipping (1-5 coins).
ANACS grading would be $16 but there's a 5 coin minimum. Shipping would be $29-35.
i don't slab coins for these reasons especially the cost involved. I don't know why this is so popular today. just making the grading companies wealthy
the neck area is a dead giveaway and this is how photographs what a actual coin appears like in hand and if ICG doesn't assign a grade you know there is something wrong.
even with the high amount of overhead glare the colors that are apparent especially on the reverse is indicative of some type of cleaning. the coin would grade straight. due to the lighting is difficult to determine wear on the coin. AU details (cleaned)
how did you come by this coin. love the doubling. I'm going against the grain and when I look at the obverse I'm seeing a coin that had some circulation. AU55
it's one of the most common morgans. this is not one I spend $$ to slab. with the eye appeal you would not get top dollar for it in whatever grade it is since there are so many nicer examples out there
Matt, there is too much glare from the lighting to determine surfaces. cant see wear, surface marks or luster. coin could be AU58, MS63 or MS64. if you want a better assessment resend without overhead lighting