| Author |
 Replies: 17 / Views: 2,444 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1045 Posts |
Nice example. I would guess you paid about....oh.....well.....about $15.50 plus $6.50 (probably economy shipping) for a total of $22.00  Cheers, -Kurt |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10045 Posts |
 good "guess"! |
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4778 Posts |
Quote:
I would guess you paid about....oh.....well.....about $15.50 plus $6.50 (probably economy shipping) for a total of $22.00 Are you psychic by any chance?  So, $22 sound like a good price for it? |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2596 Posts |
Nice coin and a nice price.
Edited by jessvc1
02/27/2012 9:22 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
870 Posts |
Nothing to worry about on the price.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4778 Posts |
Thanks guys!
Edited by VisigothKing
02/27/2012 9:25 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4778 Posts |
This is my first purchase from him BTW
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23731 Posts |
Very nice coin, excellent price.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3229 Posts |
Very nice coin! The desert patina is very attractive!  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4253 Posts |
Nice coin, but I'm missing something here. I have no idea who this seller is. I'll probably slap myself once I know.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10045 Posts |
You might--it's "Lucernae". I just bought a group of Romans from him--combined postage. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4253 Posts |
I thought that may be who you were all talking about. I've laid off buying for a few weeks now so I have to be re-trained.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4778 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1549 Posts |
This is a pretty coin. Its only significant fault is the missing mintmark which would have been PCON or SCON but it is worth the price paid from the portrait at least.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4778 Posts |
Quote:
Its only significant fault is the missing mintmark which would have been PCON or SCON That's true, but hey it still looks pretty good for being over 1600 years old |
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 17 / Views: 2,444 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 02/27/2012 8:57 pm
