|
This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.| Author |
Replies: 21 / Views: 3,506 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4038 Posts |
I'm expecting the best shot will be the one with the highest magnification, as long as the focus is good. That said, it's hard to tell since the images are not full-size so we can't look at them in detail. So, likely the 6th from the bottom will be the best. Can you do a 100% crop and re-post the crop?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7375 Posts |
Sure no problem! This one had an aperture of 5.9, a shutter speed of 1/50, and an exposure compensation of -1.3. The coin was a bit too close to the lens, so the zoom just put it out of focus. After I uploaded the pictures I noticed that the cameras Program Mode was pretty cool. As I was looking at the histogram in the viewfinder, and increasing exposure compensation, the histogram was moving from the left towards the center. Unfortunately I don't have any software with a histogram. I can enhance pretty good with the Kodak software though. This crop looks really out of focus. Thanks again. Ed 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4038 Posts |
Much better from exposure viewpoint. Now just fix the focus issues and you'll be doing fine. Only critique I have is that it's more natural to have the light hit the subject in the face. It looks like you are lighting the coin mostly from around 10:00 but I don't see a corresponding 2:00, and this is making the face dark and the overall coin unbalanced...Ray
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Keep in mind, with a zoom lens the minimum distance at which your camera is capable of focusing changes depending on the zoom. Zoomed all the way out, your minimum focusing distance is 7.9". Zoomed all the way in, that distance increases to 19.7", and it will be on a sliding scale for zooms in between. The ultimate size of the coin on the lens tends not to vary much for that reason, and I usually default to "zoomed all the way out" because most point-and-shoot camera lenses tend to be sharpest at that setting.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7375 Posts |
Thanks guys. Really appreciate it! You are right about the face shadow. I changed the angle of the tripod so 2 legs would fit square on the desk, and I could see the viewfinder better, which made the light come more out of 10 o'clock.....and it shows. Will have to straighten things out again.
Ray, just curious...if you had to pick a second coin out of the lot, which one would it be? If I had to pick one, it would be more like the one above the one you picked. Maybe I'm just currently biased toward a brighter looking coin and a background which looks more "black/grey" than purplish. But that's just me :-) Am also a little nervous that I won't be able to recreate exactly the one you picked, because I'll have to lower the coin a bit to focus properly. Thanks again. Ed
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7375 Posts |
Here's one I took at the end of the session last night. I had it as close as I could get it with no zoom, f3,1/125,ISO 100,-0.7 correction. I cropped it and enhanced it a "little." Probably should have cropped it more.  Any better? Worse? Thanks. Ed
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4038 Posts |
Ed...that's looking much better from all perspectives. Still not quite flat, though :) Is the color correct? ...Ray
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7375 Posts |
What do you mean by 'still not quite flat, though?' Are you talking about IN GOD WE TRUST not quite level? I think I also have a bias toward her looking a hair upward....more distinguished looking...chin up :-) Color? Hummmm......... The color could be actually very close, but just not sure. In real life it's shinier, which also might make it "seem" a bit brighter/lighter in color. Would brighter lights help bring out more luster in a photo, or is the camera a limiting factor. Have actually sold a few (should say 'given away for a song')on ebay, a few that look like this. A totally rookie picture, way too light and hot/bright, but at least it seems to look shiny to me. If I could add a little shine to the photo in the last post I'd be happy. Maybe getting greedy here :-) At least think the bulbs in my fixtures need to be replaced, and maybe lowered a bit closer to the coin if possible. Can't thank you enough. Ed 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Quote: The color could be actually very close, but just not sure. In real life it's shinier, which also might make it "seem" a bit brighter/lighter in color. What we're talking about here is White Balance. White Balance 101: Every form of lighting has a color. You'll note that standatd incandescent lamps in your house are a bit "yellowish," fluorescent lamps are a bit whiter, sunlight is quite different, etc. This color is measured in Kelvin, the same scale used for the colors of stars (the temperature "Kelvin" is a different scale). The Kelvin scale runs from theoretical zero to 10,000. An incandescent lamp is about 2800k, the standard "Cool White" fluorescent is 4000k, and daylight at Noon is about 5500k. Your camera has to figure this, and apply correction for the color "cast" thrown by differing-color lighting. The Z1485IS has no ability to create "Custom" white balance settings, which is a handicap. Do you have the manual for it, by the way? If not, here (.pdf): http://resources.kodak.com/support/...G_GLB_en.pdfSo you need to use either the "Auto" setting on your camera, or one of the presets: Daylight, Tungsten (the setting for incandescent bulbs), Fluorescent or Open Shade (shade is actually, believe it or not, a higher color temperature than daylight - about 6000k). I'm guessing you're using Auto right now. Some cameras are pretty darn good on Auto, others not so much. Here's how you tell how well you're doing, now that you've realized it isn't really as easy to decide if the coin is the right color, depicted on a computer monitor, as it is in-hand (  ): Switch to a white background for a few shots. That background is going to tell you the quality of your white balance. You're OK as long as it's pure white, or some shade of grey. If you see any "color" at all in it, your white balance is off. That degree of grey is also a rough (very rough) estimate of the quality of your exposure - the darker the grey, the more you're underexposed. But the trouble is, the more lustrous a coin is, the more "underexposed" a background needs to be for the bright coin to be properly exposed. Here's an example:  The coin itself is appropriately-exposed, but the background (which I know to be white as I shot this) is not only grey but varying in shade of grey depending on how the pattern of the lighting I chose falls on it. Your takeaway from all this is, as long as your background color is accurate, you can assume that the coin's color is accurate as well. And you're correct in thinking that how "bright" the coin is in the image (either luster or exposure) has a bearing on how the color will appear. This is a known phenomenon, and the more savvy members looking at your images in the forum will take that into account. One last thing, while I'm going off on color and brightness: If you have not already, set your Metering to "Spot." This will force the camera to take its' exposure information from the very center of the image, where you can be sure that the coin itself will be what the camera used to determine ISO, exposure and aperture (depending on how you're telling it to operate). "Center-Weighted" is also an appropriate choice, but cameras differ in how much weight they give to the center of the image or how large that "center" is, so stick with "Spot." One more thing. Quote: Would brighter lights help bring out more luster in a photo, or is the camera a limiting factor. Luster needs direct light to present. The closer you can get your lighting to a "point source," the easier you'll find it to depict luster. As a bare minimum, "standard" household light bulbs are probably the "largest" source which will depict luster. Tube fluorescents won't do such a good job. This is partly why we're such fans of the little Jansjo LED lamps (available at Ikea) around here (in addition to the fact that they're cheap (  )) - they're very small and as close to a "point source" as one can get with lighting. You can always add some diffusion to them, for those conditions when diffusion might be recommended, and I'm not getting into that end of things right now. This wall of text is bad enough.  The tradeoff for "point source" lighting is brighter and darker areas on a given coin. You can see that in my image above - the darker areas towards the rim. I personally don't consider that a bad thing - the contrast helps to emphasize the coin's luster, to me. There. That should be enough to bore you and everybody else reading for at least one more day. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7375 Posts |
Not bored at all here. I really appreciate your response. Hopefully this thread will also help a few lurkers/shy people who also have Kodak cameras and average lighting  Pardon the digression. Will try and respond in order. Yes I do have the manual, thanks. I have been using the fluorescent choice for white balance. In regular P&S mode I was getting green/yellow photos, so the 'fluorescent' white balance is doing much better. Will probably try 'auto' to see what happens. Thanks for the suggestion to switch to a white background. Am anxious to try it. Will typical copy paper work? Will definitely look for any 'color,' and/or for the shade of grey. I feel a little better knowing that if the background color is correct, the coins color is correct. So let me ask a stupid ? In your photo, the background is actually white, but shows as grey. Is your coin's color correct? Or am I comparing apples and oranges, or as long as it's some shade of grey, you're ok. I think I am using center-weighted metering....will switch to spot. On a side note, there is a mode on my camera called Program Mode, which automatically controls the aperture, and shutter speed, but allows control over exposure compensation. That might be worth a try. Yeah, I'm drooling over the Jansjo lights, but am still trying to recover from an August coin spending spree  Time to get back to work now after spending a shameful amount of time online. Thanks again. Ed
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4038 Posts |
"White" is just a shade of grey. All shades of grey are equal R,G, and B values. The only time "white" looks white on-screen is if it's fully saturated (RGB values of 255,255,255), or nearly so. What you're trying for is a white background that looks white to you with the lighting you will use to shoot the coin, and when your white balance is correct it will read equal RGB like 100,100,100.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7375 Posts |
Thanks for the 'white being a shade' of grey explaination. Tonight when I got home from work, replaced all 4 fluorescent bulbs, and lowered them a couple of inches. Raised the coin up 5" from the desk, and now with the lens extended, it is only 6" from the coin. I changed the metering to spot focusing. The 4 foot bulbs are 12" above the coin. Didn't think this camera was supposed to focus closer than about 8", but when I looked at the photos, they looked focused to me. They also looked pretty good and I got really excited. I only took 3 shots. ISO 100, f2.8, and the 3 shutter speed were 1/125, 160, and 200. the auto exposure comp varied from a little above, to a little under, exposed. These are totally raw, less cropping. Left some background for comparison. I definitely see some improvement, and no more shadow on her face. Please give me your opinions. I think I like the middle one the best. Mucho thanks again.  Ed    Didn't have time to do much tonight. these swing shifts really get in the way of my hobbies 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4038 Posts |
Looking better. Still 2 things to do: 1) Rotate the coin until the IN GOD WE TRUST is level 2) Still too much light hitting the top of SBA's head, causing blown-out highlights. Try moving the light on the right a little lower to get rid of the highlighting under the eye. And one new thing...the lights seem to be at a lower angle now. Shadows around the devices are now edged with highlights. Try bringing your lights up a little higher. I expect this is a byproduct of your having the camera closer to the coin, as now you have less room for the lights. This is the classic problem with Point and Shoot cameras, and with short macro lenses on DSLRs or MILCs. The lens or camera or both get in the way of high-angle lighting...
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7375 Posts |
Ray thanks, I will work on getting the IGWT level. Working room is a bit of an issue. I thought it was level 'til I saw the picture. Doh! Will also work on the lighting a bit. I'm using 2, four foot long, 2 bulb fixtures. I think they are 35W, 4100K, Cool White bulbs. They are suspended, and centered, right to left, above the coin. There is no right or left light, more like front and rear. I could probably raise or lower one side or the other. I think the coin is sitting more under the front light, so the back light is shining on her head. I will try and adjust them a bit, and maybe post a photo or two to show what I'm working with. Thanks again. Ed
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7375 Posts |
Interesting.....so I tried a white background, and compared the 'fluorescent' white balance setting to the 'auto' setting and the auto actually did a little better job. The white showed up just a bit purple using the F setting, and looked white using A. Which looks better? AUTO  FLOURESCENT  I must be a bit of a color freak...kinda like the touch of purple, but not sure if that's the consensus. I really like the one that would sell the coin better  Thanks. Ed
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 21 / Views: 3,506 |
Page 2 of 2
|
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use
|
| Coin Community Forum |
© 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums |
| It took 0.42 seconds to rattle this change. |
 |
|
| |
| |