| Author |
Replies: 31 / Views: 4,828 |
Page 3 of 3
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
70 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
First constructive criticism: It takes a bit of a touch to get the CCF Uploader to provide large images, which are what we need for appropriate evaluation. You're likely getting very large images and having to downsize heavily to post here; what we need are images of at least 800 pixels in diameter (actual coin size) to be able to see what's actually going on with the photos. Grab yourself a (free) membership at Photobucket, postprocess your images to 800-000px diameter, and post them here from there. Here's a tutorial for Photobucket posting: https://goccf.com/t/53146
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
70 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
70 Posts |
And her are a couple of pictures of an XF 45 1914 S Barber Half:   I used two daylight fluorescent bulbs with tissue paper diffuser (high tech.) for lighting. Advice please! 
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
70 Posts |
And a few shots of a raw 1907 D AU Barber Half:   I'm not as happy with these images. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3161 Posts |
Congrats Jeff! Their great shots.... have you had a chance to use the tubes yet?
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
70 Posts |
With the full set of Macro tubes: 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3161 Posts |
Holy smokes that's cool! Great detail! Love the die break along the bottom.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Quote: With the full set of Macro tubes:
Snerk. Cool, ain't it?  I think your lighting might be at a bit too low an angle on the 1907; I'm expecting to see the highlights a bit "higher" on the nose, chin, forehead and cap. Is the color on the 1905 correct? Maybe a bit over-diffused? Thinking I should see more luster.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
70 Posts |
I'll try adjusting the lighting on the '07. On the '05 that's all the luster there is- original toning. All shots were done with the lighting in identical positions.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
70 Posts |
Here's a nice MS 1949 Franklin half with the identical setup:  Perhaps it's easier to critique where it's easier to know what the coin should look like in hand.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Quote: Perhaps it's easier to critique where it's easier to know what the coin should look like in hand.
You, of course, have to be the ultimate judge of how close the image is to in-hand. Keep in mind, though, that you're going to need to look at the coin under the same light you're using to shoot it, to make that determination. You're getting all the sharpness one would expect out of the lens. However, I don't think you're 100% square to the coin - the bottom of the Franklin looks a little out of focus while the top is super-sharp. Drop a pocket mirror onto the surface which holds the coin, and adjust the camera so the reflected image of the lens is exactly centered in the taken shot. That'll ensure you're plumb, square and level with the coin.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
70 Posts |
You are correct- I was looking for a mirror yesterday and couldn't find one that wasn't attached to a wall. Super Dave, you have good eyes!
CVS here I come.
I tried adding close-up lens stacked with the tubes on the Tamron- it really didn't let me focus any closer than with just the tubes (unless I was doing something wrong).
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
70 Posts |
I've been practicing a bit with different lighting techniques (1 to 3 lights, angles, etc.). I think I'm getting better. A shot from yesterday:   Any constructive criticism? I'm using daylight fluorescent lights- are they too soft?
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
70 Posts |
Another coin where I used Paint.net to get a circle crop:  
|
|
Page 3 of 3
|
Replies: 31 / Views: 4,828 |
Page 3 of 3
|