| Author |
 Replies: 20 / Views: 2,627 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6370 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Puerto Rico
778 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2368 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
688 Posts |
MS-62, I don't think I see any wear
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2362 Posts |
I'm in at least AU58 - beautiful coin.  Member ANA and EAC "You got to lose to know how to win". Dream On by Aerosmith |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3843 Posts |
Appears to be at least high AU perhaps low MS. Hate to be the forum's Debbie Downer; However you have to ask yourself why a coin of this quality -- with nice toning -- hasn't been slabbed?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
5417 Posts |
It was slabbed, by ANACS in an Older Holder, before it was cracked out. I have the slab insert  Anyway, thanks for all the opinions. I only wish this coin was MS though, there is slight wear under the wing and a bit on the cap as well. But I think AU-55 or AU-58 (If I'm lucky) isn't unreasonable. More posts to come when my 3 other CBH's get here next week. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5854 Posts |
AU-55 or 58 sounds about right.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4337 Posts |
what did anacs give it? I think that is a beautiful half with great color.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36839 Posts |
AU-58 with a shot at an MS grade. A beauty!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5417 Posts |
ANACS gave the coin AU-50, which is undergraded IMO. The toning is a bit uneven though, there's a small stain in front of the mouth. I'm hoping the coin will tone over evenly soon. Appreciate all the opinions.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36839 Posts |
Seems to be under graded at AU-50.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Israel
2420 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
589 Posts |
 Just came back from the NGC. |
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5417 Posts |
Ugh? So NGC ended up body bagging that coin? I don't see what the problem is with it, it was cracked out from a problem-free old generation ANACS holder (Cert# 891275) and it's honestly better than the AU-50 they gave it. Indeed the obverse does have some hairlines around the bust, but I don't think they should've been so harsh. What did the other two grade like?
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 20 / Views: 2,627 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 09/14/2014 6:48 pm
