| Author |
 Replies: 19 / Views: 2,572 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
 200 Posts |
Thank you! :)
I'm very happy! :D
|
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
435 Posts |
Here is an image taken from RIC VII, Rome, with the relevant reference. I may be mistaken, but is the reverse actually more like RIC VII ROME 140 regarding the legend breaks? Yes the obverse is like 142, but...?  Btw. Here is the part of the key to the obverse types that applies here:  Edited by Valecrucis
11/20/2014 5:15 pm
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23731 Posts |
I guess I'm going to have to use my RIC catalogs more often, I'm just too lazy to search through them.
|
|
Valued Member
200 Posts |
My coin is RIC VII 142 I think also!
Because the 140 obverse legend is: CONSTANTINVS AVG
Thank you all! :)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1045 Posts |
IMO, bust is B4 Laureate draped and cuirassed and the legend break is definitely VICTOR-I-A as you can see the "I" is clearly seperated between the wreath and head, thus RIC 142 @echizento, it is listed on helvetica's pages too so you can still be lazy like me  Edited by Biancasdad
11/20/2014 5:36 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
435 Posts |
No question the bust is B4. The reverse legend reads VICTOR - I - ACAESS as in 140 though; not VICTOR - I - A - CAESS as 142 suggests. The actual representation of Victory does seem to be as described for 142 however, with Victory seeming to be advancing not standing. So it seems to be a bit of a mixture of elements to me.
|
|
Moderator
United States
23731 Posts |
Gee, I checked there, missed it completely.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1045 Posts |
Val, 140 lists the legend as VICTORI-A which it clearly isn't as the "I" is separate from the "A"
In both cases it is ACAESS but for some reason RIC denotes that in two different ways, one with a 'space' and one with a 'dash'
|
|
Valued Member
200 Posts |
And 140 is a coin of Constantine I NOT Constantine II. :)
|
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
435 Posts |
Yes that is right BD. I missed that 140 showed the VICTOR together with the I and was thrown by the two different ways of showing that the A is conjoined with the CAESS. My mistake then....it is a clear 142. For the record though, I never did say it actually was the 140 itself.  ...and I did say I might be mistaken! Oops!   Edited by Valecrucis
11/20/2014 5:43 pm
|
|
Valued Member
200 Posts |
Edited by Baltas
11/20/2014 5:43 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1045 Posts |
LOL Val, for the record, I know you didn't  But you DO get a consolation prize for using the word 'conjoined', which eluded me when trying to describe the ACAESS situation |
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
435 Posts |
Well I don't deserve anything more than a very little wooden spoon after creating such confusion! Conjoined or not! It's not for nothing I have chosen my below the line signature!  Edited by Valecrucis
11/20/2014 5:52 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4971 Posts |
that's a cool coin, I always like to see some cool LRB that isn't just the usual stuff.
I have tons of the "usual stuff", but not one of these.
|
|
Valued Member
200 Posts |
I was lucky! :) I bought this lot, and I still id the others.  |
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 19 / Views: 2,572 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 11/20/2014 5:13 pm
