| Author |
Replies: 20 / Views: 5,100 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
Legal tender is an interesting concept that has changed in it's interpretation over the years. Today legal tender means a legally recognized offer of payment, in the nineteenth century it was an obligatory form of payment. It had to be accepted. But many of the coins back then had only limited legal tender standing. Gold and standard silver dollars had unlimited legal tender status and had to be accepted for any amount. That was true of the other silver coins (except the Three Cent piece) before 1853. After 1853 the smaller silver coins were only legal tender up to $5. Amounts offered above that amount could legally be refused. The base metal coins also had only limited legal tender status, the cent was not legal tender at all until 1864, the Half Cent not until the 20th century. This DID cause problems after the FE cents were introduced in 1857. The marketplace became saturated with the new coin. Since most purchases were for small amounts merchants had little choice but to accept them. But the banks can and did refuse the coins if their supplies were adequate. So the merchants accepted them, but may or may not be able to deposit them. And they really couldn't use them to purchase stock from their suppliers either. Frequently they only way to get rid of them was to sell them to jobbers at a discount. The limited tender silver was not as much of a problem because $5 was a significant amount of money and it wasn't as difficult to pass then to the bank in multiple deposits or by exchanging the silver in small amounts for gold and then depositing the gold. To get a good idea of what coinage and its use were like in the 19th century I recommend reading Neil Carothers book Fractional Money. Copies can be found for about $15 to $20
Edited by Conder101 09/01/2015 11:58 am
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188440 Posts |
Ah. So the banks did differentiate it in a sense by refusing deposit.
|
|
New Member
United States
29 Posts |
That's interesting BStrauss3, while browsing coin videos on Youtube sometime ago I ran across one that was titled something like "Paying $80 bill with pennies". Some kid owed a tow company $80 to get his car out so he went and got $80 in pennies, when the company refused to accept them as payment the kid called the police. The police told the company that the pennies are legal and they had to take them so the company took them so long as the kid stood there and counted them out.
Seems to always be a sort of hot topic whether businesses have to accept pennies as payment or not. Even police don't usually know whether they really have to.
IMHO, it's simply an immature act to pay in pennies when you could go cash them in at a bank, I'd never do it just on the basis that I'd never want it done to me haha...
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188440 Posts |
Yeah, do not be a jerk. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
1325 Posts |
Now I am curious. Since the Mint is the only leagal producer of coins in the US, what are the beer tokens the bar gives considered? They look like poker chips make of hard plastic and have the bars name on them and give no change in return, but they are gotten by exchanging the price of a beer.
Are they considered gift certificates? Arcades for years have made tokens to get your full dollar up front and then you have to pay with the token in the machine. So If a business used ONLY tokens for payments and put token amounts as the prices, would that work and be legal under that law? They only sell tokens for cash, and then all items can be got from trading in token, like PuttPutt does with its prize tickets.
Isn't that in effect creating your own currency?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
Such a situation as you describe with the bar tokens is perfectly legal BUT the tokens can only be used internally. Using them in between businesses or accepting tokens from other businesses is not legal. The casinos in Las Vegas ran into this problem in the mid sxties. When the silver dollars disappeared they created their own "chips" to replace them and the government didn't mind at first. But tourists wander from one casino to another and would use chips from one casino in the slots on on the gaming table at another. Rather than lose the money by refusing them the casinos would accept them and then redeem them later at the issuing casino. When that started the government DID put their foot down and put a stop to it. So now you can still get chips at a casino, but they are only usable at that casino.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7390 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
95 Posts |
Many 1960s casino chips had distinctive edging, so that when stacked it would be obvious to the table dealer that an "illegal" chip was present. At first, the first chips varied in size, the Hurrah's chip was gigantic (1965). I am not sure that the casinos accepted chips from another casino!! Many of the chips have stamped "for use only at..." or,..."this token for use by player only" (such as on the Wagon Wheel Casino and Hotel token). Some did accept chips from a networked casino, such as Hurrah's in Reno and Lake Tahoe. Chips at casinos came into existence because the mint stopped issuing (or the banks did) silver dollars, especially the Morgan and Peace dollars. So in 1965, the casino's secured the special chips from the Franklin Mint (primarily). The practice ended when the US mint issued the Eisenhower dollars. Today many of the old obsolete casino chips are quite collectible, and becoming scarce. (and hence many surviving Eisenhower dollars show much abuse)!!
Edited by GSDykes 09/14/2015 3:11 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
1325 Posts |
Quote: Such a situation as you describe with the bar tokens is perfectly legal BUT the tokens can only be used internally. Ok, so maybe I have asked this before but that TV show with the guy, I think he was married to Teri Hatcher (Lois Lane) at one time, had "BerkShares" mentioned on it. The law says you can't mint money, only the US Mint can, so these BerkShares were like bills. the "bar token" is like a poker chip, or a coin. Doesn't that mean even internally these are coins? Could a business issue change only in its own "exchange tokens"? or is the smallest limit $1 since anything less at this time would be considered a "coin"? If the business had no change to give and everything was rounded (including tax) to a dollar? Someone goes into a store, buys $200 worth of store tokens, they function like gift certificates for example, right? So what is the smallest size gift certificate, in token form? Considering 25-cent style arcade tokens still exist and all...
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
It really depends on how much they want to go after you. For example the arcade tokens you mention. Companies have been making a using those for decades with no interference, But if the government wanted to they could go after them and shut them down because they are illegal under Title 18 Chapter 25 Sec 336 and 491. Sec 336 says
Whosoever makes, issues, circulates, or pays out any note, check, memorandum, token, or other obligation for a less sum than $1, intended to circulate as money or to be received or used in lieu of lawful money of the United states, shall be fined not more than $500 or imprisoned not more than six months. (This was the law that was used to end the Civil War tokens in 1863.)
The first part of Sac 491 says Whosoever, being 18 years of age or over, not lawfully authorized, makes issues, or passes any coin, card, token or device in metal or its compounds intended to be used as money....Shall be fined not more than $1000, or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
Now they haven't used these laws against the arcade people, or the casinos, but they are on the books and they could use them at any time they so chose.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4591 Posts |
-----Burton 50+ year / Life / Emeritus ANA member (joined 12/1/1973) Life member: Numismatics International, CONECA Member: TNA, FtWCC, NETCC, EveryCountry (online) coin club Owned by three cats and a wife of 40+ years (joined 1983) Author: 3rd Edition of the Sample Slabs book, https://www.sampleslabs.info/
|
|
Pillar of the Community
1325 Posts |
Quote: Now they haven't used these laws against the arcade people, or the casinos, but they are on the books and they could use them at any time they so chose. Now that is just scary some crazed politician could have everyone owning and using arcade tokens arrested and fined. 
Edited by shadz 09/15/2015 12:19 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
Lots of things can be scary. There are laws on the books which they can use to bring charges against pretty much anyone. A couple of my favorites that I have seen used in the charges against some admittedly bad people are possession of bomb making materials, or weapons of mass destruction.
What are bomb making materials? Chemicals or items that can be used in the construction of a bomb. These can include but are not restricted to things like nitric or sulfuric acid, bleach, batteries, wire, timing devices such as watches or cell phones etc.
I though WMD's was an odd charge because typically when the think of WMD's we think of chemical, nuclear, or biological weapons. So I checked to see what the legal definition of a WMD is. it is any weapon that can kill or injure more than one person at the same time, or an explosive item containing more then 4 oz of explosives. Ever see those shyrocket moror shells you can buy at any fireworks stand or shop around the country? The larger ones of those contain 500 grams of explosives. Four times the amount required to legally be a WMD. So buy some fireworks to celebrate the fourth of July and you could be charged with being in possession of weapons of mass destruction.
I'm not saying thy would do it, but if they wanted to get you on SOMETHING those two charges could be used against just about anyone. (and if they do have someone on some other charge they are nasty charges that could be added to make the bad guys life more difficult.)
Edited by Conder101 09/16/2015 11:49 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
1325 Posts |
Well that being the case everyone should be arrested for their bathroom since there is always rubbing alcohol and toilet paper there.  SO the silliness of laws aside, it IS or IS NOT feasible/legal if a store were to operate solely on "tokens" like an arcade and the only cash or currency transactions are the buying of those tokens? (once you buy a token you don't get cash back for it, like a coupon it have 1/1000th of a cent value.)
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
I'd say legal yes, feasible probably not except for very limited circumstances.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 20 / Views: 5,100 |
Page 2 of 2
|