| Author |
 Replies: 40 / Views: 3,536 |
Page 3 of 3
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
258 Posts |
yeah how this happened I think was one coin got jammed then another one on top of it then the coin got struck and the two fused together and 1 coin got stuck in the die causing the brockage just a guess
|
|
Valued Member
United States
223 Posts |
Nice coin Eric! I am no expert on error coins, but that is a very interesting coin. Just wondering; where I should post my error coins? Would it be ok if I posted one here?
|
|
Valued Member
United States
258 Posts |
go to the top of the page and click on new topic that will let you post what errors you have
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3644 Posts |
That is crazy-nice find! keep us posted...
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5828 Posts |
Very awesome coin... I have been following this thread since the beginning! Send it in through NGC in that case, and let us know what it gets.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2740 Posts |
So you're telling us this coin weighs 5.44 grams or thereabouts? Are you sure your scale is accurate? I would have expected two bonded steel cents struck in-collar to look even thicker on-edge and to show more exaggerated finning on the reverse. I have never seen any bonded steel cents, let alone a pair struck in-collar. I've seen very few in-collar bonded pairs among all denominations.
At the very least, this coin displays a mid-stage brockage of the reverse design on the obverse face. I've seen a fair number of steel cents with similar errors. The brockage looks genuine as does the die-struck reverse design. I'm just skeptical about the double thickness / double weight you allege.
Error coin writer and researcher.
Edited by mikediamond
06/10/2016 11:19 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2189 Posts |
Have you decided on what your going do with? Seems like a tough call to make
Edited by jasper62
06/10/2016 9:16 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
258 Posts |
probably taking it over to icg I had another find this week but not sure if its legit or not its a 1916 buffalo looks like maybe it was struck on a wrong planchet possibly a foreign I'm gonna do another post please give me any thoughts on this one as well  |
|
Valued Member
United States
258 Posts |
weight is 4.0 on the buffalo
Edited by eric ramsdell
06/12/2016 7:00 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3644 Posts |
Strange alright...I don't see how it would have a fully formed rim tho if it was an undersized foreign planchet
|
|
Moderator
 United States
15564 Posts |
I'm checking out of this thread ... the OP has heard from Mike Diamond and there is no better error expert to call upon. The appearance of another coin in the same thread .. Buffalo nickel ... well ... for me I am wondering why the posts are not separated? David |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2740 Posts |
The Buffalo nickel was altered outside the Mint. The perfect centering, absence of metal flow in peripheral letters, and the presence of a thin, pushed-up margin are all bright red flags. Error coin writer and researcher.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
258 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1812 Posts |
 If this is 2 Steel Cents that bonded together, and you were to separate them, wouldn't you have the bottom Cent with a Reverse Blockage and top Cent a Reverse Blockage / Counter-Brockage |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1812 Posts |
Quote:
wouldn't you have the bottom Cent with a Reverse Blockage and top Cent a Reverse Blockage / Counter-Brockage And a week after posting this, I notice that my new tablet's Auto-Correct has changed Brockage to Blockage.. Any ideas on how to deep 6 my Auto-Correct (guess I need to check my other posts)  |
|
Page 3 of 3
|
Replies: 40 / Views: 3,536 |
Page 3 of 3
|
First Page
Previous Page
Posted 06/10/2016 10:42 am
