But Wait There's More ! Three Extra Images ! On This 1967 Lincoln .

I don't see it, But I have old eyes. Maybe die wear.

w/ slamnbass, think your looking too hard to find an error coin, particularly a hitherto unknown kind. Like me, learn to identify what IS a definite seeable error coin under "normal" magnification. I only use scope to verify such as a D/D RPM once I have "suspected" it under a 25X loupe, then I scope it out to compare with the listings on Coppercoins.com. By many means tho, keep searching, keep asking & learning...we all have a looonnngg way too go before we know it all!

Who knows it just maybe an old die clash?

I also Inverted the coin to take the pics so they would be easier to see upright would it be better for me to leave them Inverted so you can see them as such

Here is the coin through the loupe and I changed the lighting so you can see the orientation what I thought was two bases is actually one the third is harder to see without more magnification the mirrored inverted base is at a 45 degree angle from base . I did not think it is a doubles die but was thinking it was material left from a previous strike .


And another through 10x

Pete2226 wouldn't that cause it to be incuse? because this is not .

Oh ok I understand , I thought you meant a gouge on the coin . That makes sense !

I want to thank everyone for the input on this thread ! If I sounded frustrated it was not towards any of you it was frustration with myself for not being able to convey what I was seeing to you. I do value the knowledge that is in these replies . I still wonder what could pile up the material like this if it could be a chip, I learned from another thread that dents and feeder finger gouges are usually at the rim . This is another mystery I may never know the answer to but it was fun doing the forensics ! Thanks again !