| Author |
Replies: 18 / Views: 2,705 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
24885 Posts |
 To the Forum.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
 to CCF. Post pics of what you have in the correct section. We will be able to help you out much better. John1 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188560 Posts |
 to the Community! I moved your post to the appropriate forum for the proper attention. 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Pics please!  to the CCF!
|
|
New Member
 United States
1 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
10197 Posts |
 Carlos Try to orient the pix if you would then what are your questions about them, hate to guess but will anyway. 1981D has feeder tracks from being fed into a counting machine the other two are copper plated zinc core (post 1982) that seem to be showing Machine Damage (MD) around the dates and mintmarks by that "ghosting" effect of the copper plating being moved, stretched and at time split revealing the core underneath. 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188560 Posts |
I asked Bobby to merge this with the exiting topic. 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
The 81 is roller mark lines. The other two are split copper plating. John1 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
 to the CCF!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7512 Posts |
 to the forum.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
The 81 D is a woody, the alloy variations having been stretched out by the rolling process and the the toning setting in.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188560 Posts |
The 1981-D is a nice example. 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
I would keep the 1981-D. John1 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4211 Posts |
 Carlos~!! The 1981-D is a nice coin. I would hold on to that one.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 18 / Views: 2,705 |
Page 2 of 2
|