| Author |
Replies: 17 / Views: 3,282 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
I am no pro but, your pics do look out of focus,scope and phone. The scope pics look like the white balance is out of adjustment also. Instead of fluorescence light, use a hand held LED flashlight. Block off all but the LED at 12k on your scope and you may need to put a filter on that one. John1 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1901 Posts |
I turn all the lights off on my scope
And also I view all of the pics on my phone would that make a difference how good I can see them if they are out of focus or not?
Edited by Mrzllewellyn 01/19/2018 05:35 am
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
It might, being a small screen. John1 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4038 Posts |
The issue is not really one of "focus". It's more that neither the USB scope nor the smart phone have particularly sharp optics, so don't produce sharp photos. The standard for COC and other sites for publishing is a bit higher than can be achieved with this equipment. Most of the photos published on those sites were taken with lab microscopes using a camera on the eyepiece. This method is sharper than either USB or smartphone optics, so appears more "focused".
Contact me for photographic equipment or visit my home page at: http://macrocoins.com
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1901 Posts |
Well I don't have a million dollars to spend on equipment so I'm guessing my listings will stop which I hate but I guess I won't be able to get the quality wanted with what I can afford
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
Don't give up so easily. Practice. I have two scopes and a point and shoot camera and I can get "good enough" pics. John1 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4038 Posts |
Have your images from this equipment been published before on COC or other sites?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4038 Posts |
Sorry to be so negative about this...
Looking at your "app" photos, they are much better than the USB camera ones, so there may be some hope. How are you taking those?
Contact me for photographic equipment or visit my home page at: http://macrocoins.com
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
Mrzllewellyn, Have you tried one of those clip on magnifiers for your phone? John1 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1901 Posts |
No but I was looking at them online lastnight and was looking at different apps and my camera features and all I really do want clear and in focus pictures but don't have the cash to be buying a nice set up and all just got to deal with what I got or something that is a few dollars
@Rpmsrpms yes I have around 8 or so listings on coc but I need to get better pictures for a few and I can't seem to do it and I want to send him pictures on future listings in focus and sharp you know so he doesn't have to email me 6 times to take better pictures it's a waste of his time and I get frustrated because I think the pictures look good but they don't you know? Win win
|
|
Valued Member
Russian Federation
172 Posts |
Mrzllewellyn, you no need million dollars for equipment. I have spent about $150 for 16MP USB camera and microscope lens for $25 (both new from China) No need another optics for coin pics like this (just resized) 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1901 Posts |
What is the name of the camera and the lens very nice picture
|
|
Valued Member
Russian Federation
172 Posts |
Both noname products. Search about Eakins 16MP HDMI+USB 1080@60 1/2.33" with 6 buttons on the top and as for lens it was Plan Achromat X4 finite lens. See my theme here.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1901 Posts |
My phone has a 16mp camera I wonder if I can get a lens for it that will work
|
|
Valued Member
Russian Federation
172 Posts |
Sure you can't even both devices have same type of sensor. This USB have C-mount hole for optics.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 17 / Views: 3,282 |
Page 2 of 2
|