| Author |
 Replies: 20 / Views: 2,716 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
EF-45, obverse issues at K7 diminish eye appeal.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36878 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
11901 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
AU-55. Suggest new thread, piggybacking confuses people.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11901 Posts |
This is the same coin.  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Why start the discussion over with different pics without saying these are different pics of the same coin?  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11901 Posts |
That's how I always do it. I post the seller's pictures when I make a purchase and then I post the in-hand pictures when the coin arrives. Must have done it this way over 100 times now. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3164 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11901 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36878 Posts |
Your latest photos don't show much luster. What does it really look like?
|
|
Rest in Peace
10197 Posts |
Its been dipped since original pix. Too bad, gets a max of AU50 Details cleaned IMHO now. Liked it before, gave it a 5/10 then, now is 3/10. How do I know? The halo around stars and removal of gunk, and the stain on rev 7 o'clock is gone. If you cleaned it you goofed, or seller bait/switched on pix...it is the same coin (Spidey cracks)  . Overpaid for that coin, was iffy price for original pix, new pix shows common date (no variety) at 25% over value.  Edited by Crazyb0
06/19/2018 2:01 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8715 Posts |
With the new pics, I think XF-45 Details, cleaned.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11901 Posts |
this one shows about 95% luster in hand. some of it is visible in the pics. |
|
Rest in Peace
10197 Posts |
No, luster is absent in pix. Your pix taking may need some tweeking then. If I hadn't seen the die cracks, I woulda said another coin from the dispairaty of seller and your pix. See the same on the 67/rays...looks cleaned because the fingerprints in sellers pix are absent. That indicates someone ain't got the true capture...you or them, and I actually prefer the honesty of sellers pix, if it didn't look like that, I'd be returning the coin. Simple as that...
Edited by Crazyb0
06/19/2018 9:28 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11901 Posts |
I'm sure it's not cleaned. |
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 20 / Views: 2,716 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 06/14/2018 10:12 am
