| Author |
Replies: 18 / Views: 2,126 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
189222 Posts |
Quote: There are 1982s. But how to tell them apart? As long as they are not shiny new, you can flip them or drop them on a hard surface. The copper will "ring" and the zinc with "thud". You can flip a known copper (pre-82) and a known zinc (post-82) for comparison. A more "coin friendly" method is to balance them, like using a Popsicle stick over a pencil, against a known zinc or copper coin.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
1501 Posts |
I purchased an inexpensive scale, 2.5 grams for zincolns 3.1 for the coppers, makes quick work of them, although admittedly not as fun as the flipping thing, but perhaps a tad more accurate. Are you trying for a set? Or just good examples?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Poland
3201 Posts |
rockdude, now since I know about and see the large/small date difference, I will count them. jbuck, no they are not shiny. All the shinees are 1989-91. I think I know what you're talking about regarding that ''ring/thud'' COINAHOLIC, I was planning to keep one best example of every date plus a few almost-best just in case. Now I know I have to aim for the small date too. I got a 1959!  Update - Oldest LMC found: 1959  . Newest: 1991. Uglies: 43. Foreign: 2.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
189222 Posts |
Quote:Oldest LMC found: 1959 Not sure if you know this or not, but I will point out that this is the first year of the Lincoln Memorial cent. From 1909 to 1958 the Lincoln Cent had the wheat stalks on the reverse (a.k.a. wheaties). If you find an LMC older than 1959, then 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6326 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
1501 Posts |
Great! one that I'm searching for has moved to Poland! Congats on the first year LMC, I take that it has no mint mark therefore Philadelphia. All I seem to pull are 1959D's. Well I'm off to the coinstar to give some zincolns a proper burial 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Poland
3201 Posts |
Thanks and - yes, it's a 1959 (Philadelphia). If I got it in the first lot, you'll surely get one soon! If there was a chance of a 2nd one, I would keep it for you, but I've picked all that looked older already and only the shinees are left unsearched..
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
1501 Posts |
Don't underestimate the shiny or "red" cents I have a pretty good stack from the 60's and 70's 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Poland
3201 Posts |
Info for rockdude:
1982-large date found: 50 1982-small date found: 9
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6326 Posts |
Are you going to continue to get "batches" of Cents to go through ? Or was this a rare thing......in Poland musn't be easy to get em' !
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Poland
3201 Posts |
Yes, any set of more than 50 is hard to find. I know it's hard to believe considering the mintage.. but it's true. - They are not accepted by coin shops (even in lots) because they are of low value. - They are not accepted by foreign currency exchange booths - and banks don't accept foreign coins at all. - They aren't usually sold at online auctions. - One of the online coin shops sells them for $1. No matter what date/mintmark/grade, all are $1. All are 1970s-2000s and XF or below (therefore, I doubt if it's a reasonable price  ) The only way to acquire them is by buying world coin lots, in which the LMCs are thought to be an unwanted addition by many. And this way a 1989 AU cent is a kind of rarity. Not worth anything but still not easy to come by.
Edited by DL20K 08/04/2008 04:30 am
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
20753 Posts |
So what is the problem of keeping them all? Unless you really need the money that bad, why not just keep them all. Lots of error coins in the 80's with offsets. You can find out a lot on https://www.coppercoins.com also. Be carefull of 1959 with a possible wheat back. 82's are fun to play with on the popsicle stick balanced on a pencil to make a balance scale. First balance the stick on a 6 sided pencil, add a touch of glue to secure. Place a pre 82 cent on the far edge and glue in place. Now any cent on the other side will not make it move unless it too is Copper. The Copper plated Zinc ones will do nothing to the scale. Of course you could glue a post 82 cent on one side and any other one on the other end will drop if Copper. Still I don't see the problem of keeping them all. You stumbled on them? Just how did you do that? If you paid for them and need the money that bad that you can't afford to save a few cents, just spend them. After you looked through them of course.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Poland
3201 Posts |
The problem of keeping them all is that the deal requires me to return at least part of them.
Now, I found an 82-copper-large date, 82-zinc-large date, and 82-zinc-small date. Good? Common?
I saw 2 with minor die cracks and one with bubbles. I know the bubbles are common but I'd like to ask - what causes them and what's the correct name for them.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Poland
3201 Posts |
OK I got the rest of the LMCs. Now I have 1959-60-61-62-63-64-65-66-67-68-69 etc. So I've completed my 1960s  Still there was NO wheats. Zero in a few hundred coins accumulated in 1991? Am I wrong, or were these coins searched for wheats?
|
|
Valued Member
United States
271 Posts |
most likely they were searched for wheaties already...even now (atleast in the US), a box of 50 rolls will produce anywhere between 5-15 wheaties. and I still get them as change on a fairly regular basis.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 18 / Views: 2,126 |
Page 2 of 2
|