| Author |
 Replies: 17 / Views: 2,563 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18700 Posts |
the eye appeal is going to drop this one to MS64
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
MS-65, Not FSB .  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2125 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2130 Posts |
I will post the answer tomorrow night but there has been zero correct answers so far.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11898 Posts |
63. obv looks weakly struck.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
134 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8715 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2130 Posts |
Overgraded in my opinion....  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8938 Posts |
Yowza that doesn't look 67. My 66 looks leauges better and has less dings
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
314 Posts |
I would've said 65+ reverse is too good for 64
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
Although blotchy toning doesn't have a bearing on grade, in this case, it doesn't help.
Always harder to grade from pictures, especially when the coin is under plastic. Because of this reason, I agree with other opinions about over grading.
Nevertheless, I enjoy the grading challenge with threads like this one.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
I can't see myself giving this coin a 67 .forget about the blotchy toning and not being FB ,we know these have no bearing on grade . But I would have liked a better strike with the vertical sticks on fasces .  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36844 Posts |
MS-65, hope you didn't pay 67 price.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2130 Posts |
Oh I didn't purchase this coin. These are sellers photos and I just thought it was overgraded and wanted others opinions.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 17 / Views: 2,563 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 02/25/2019 4:23 pm
