| Author |
 Replies: 25 / Views: 2,002 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1298 Posts |
Grades are all over the place. I'll go with MS64.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
1273 Posts |
I'm seeing hardly any wear, looks to be a weak strike on the obverse at least, seems a little flat. But I'm going MS65 on this, 64s have more contact marks. *gets popcorn out*.
EDIT: I'm going MS64+ as there are a few small rim dings.
Edited by TobyJ
03/08/2022 11:30 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5192 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1778 Posts |
I agree with AU-58. May be MS but I cannot tell with these images.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1048 Posts |
Quote:
I agree with AU-58. May be MS but I cannot tell with these images. What's wrong with the images? To me they look very crisp, if I do say so myself, and precisely like what I have in hand. Sorry if I'm touchy, but it took me years to get my pics right. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
I'll say MS-65 for this one. Very few contact marks and I'm going to assume the luster is all there in hand. Strike is pretty typical for New Orleans mint.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
747 Posts |
I'm hard pressed to say AU55, probably lower.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1048 Posts |
At $89, I'm happy. Some of you nailed it ...  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
Nice snag and a bit undergraded I think. Toned coins don't get as much love from TPG's. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1521 Posts |
Very nice and a very good deal!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1778 Posts |
Quote:
What's wrong with the images? To me they look very crisp, if I do say so myself, and precisely like what I have in hand. Sorry, I did not mean to offend. My statement does not accurately say what I was thinking. With the toning, I find coins like this one to be hard to grade without having them in hand so that I can rotate it. Even then grading is difficult. I strive to take pictures like yours. |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12057 Posts |
Again I'm late but I think 64 is ok, I think the coin got netted down a tick based on the toning since I see a technical 65. Reminds me of the sort of toning I see on Tidy House Morgans, a bit.
Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890 "Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Based on original reverse pic, I'm dumbfounded.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
1273 Posts |
I'm on a good track record lately. It's good to compare to existing coins using heritage auction photos as they are very high quality images. I think they got this one right.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18706 Posts |
Coinfrog, you were close  my problem with the grade is the eye appeal not the best and missing luster across the cheek and a fingerprint under the S in PLURIBUS |
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 25 / Views: 2,002 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 03/08/2022 11:30 am
