| Author |
 Replies: 17 / Views: 4,557 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10045 Posts |
That ghosting might just be how it toned. I don't have any of these, so I'll let others comment on details.
The coin should weigh 26.96 gr.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
156 Posts |
KM#T5, with 5,672,000 minted in Bombay in 1912. If it is a counterfeit, it is a good one, as the design, fields, dentils, and rims look correct to me. I also took a close look at my 1901 example, and it has a similar tilted 9.
Krause puts the value at $25.00 in XF and $60.00 in Unc.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
1931 Posts |
so you believeit is authentic buzzard? it looked pretty good to me too other than that strange toning/shadowing or whatever it is. I am going to find my scale just to be sure of the weight though.
thanks for the help
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1931 Posts |
Ok I weighed it and it came up as 29.6 grams in the 2x2. (though its larger so I'd say in it's 2.5x2.5)
Does that sound like it might be right?
|
|
Valued Member
United States
156 Posts |
Back in August/September, I was looking online for photos of counterfeit examples of this coin. Both of the examples that I was able to find had vague transitions between Brittania's cloak and the background field. Your coin doesn't seem to have that issue. I'm willing to go out on a limb and say that it is real to me. Now lets find out if the weight is a match...
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1931 Posts |
weight was 29.6 grams in the holder. :)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1931 Posts |
oh and what does transitions mean? Blank areas?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1931 Posts |
Here's some less blurry pics   |
|
Valued Member
United States
156 Posts |
Oh, there's the weight. Methinks I type too slow. :)
When I mentioned vague transitions, I was referring to an effect that is visible on many counterfeit coins of modern Chinese origin. It occurs where a design element in low relief appears next to an open field. Instead of having a crisp and clear edge between design and field, there is a vague transition where the design sort of fades into the field.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
156 Posts |
Here is an example of what I meant. Check out the space to the left of the dragon's head, where the neck should be joining the head. Instead of the design continuing to the head, it just fades into the field. Counterfeit examples of your Trade dollar that I have seen show a fade between the cloak and the background. Since your dollar shows a crisp edge between cloak and field, it is either a better-than-average counterfeit or the real deal. That is why I think that yours is real.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2669 Posts |
Malissa, how many staples are in the 2.5x2.5? I can weigh one here with the right number of staples and give you the weight. That's a gorgeous coin, by the way.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10045 Posts |
In case it helps, I weighed an empty 2x2 w/4 staples here at 2.7gr
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
1077 Posts |
Wow, that's a nice coin. If it is a fake they are getting extremely good at it.
It certainly looks legit to me. Very crisp designs. Toning looks right. I am not sure if they are able to recreate realistic toning? Almost looks like parts of the coin next to the legend was in the shade and didn't catch a tan!
Does anybody know if fake toning does this? It's not just on the date seems to be all the way around the coin, on the lettering?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
1077 Posts |
Grade wise I'm inclined to go AU. I can see no wear, just a few bag marks and the toning.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1931 Posts |
thats what I was thinking too! the toning seems to be all the way around the lettering in such a weird way. It could have sat under lighting somehow for a very long time to shade that way, but I'm not sure about that. and yes the holder has 4 staples in it.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 17 / Views: 4,557 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 03/03/2009 9:00 pm
