| Author |
Replies: 24 / Views: 2,150 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
New Member
 United States
41 Posts |
That's lame what about the bleed thru from the back ONE to the front? It's fanit
|
|
New Member
 United States
41 Posts |
Also the bill doesn't feel like a eraser would have been used idk it was in my drawer at work
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4593 Posts |
Quick lesson - be careful of tone - we don't have the verbal cues you get f2f.
I'm sure you meant it's lame that somebody tampered with the note. But your words could also be taken as dismissing the educated opinion of several experts.
There is nothing that will get you ignored here faster than showing up, asking for an opinion, and being sure you are smarter than people with 20, 30, or 50 years of experience and arguing with them!
-----Burton 50+ year / Life / Emeritus ANA member (joined 12/1/1973) Life member: Numismatics International, CONECA Member: TNA, FtWCC, NETCC, EveryCountry (online) coin club Owned by three cats and a wife of 40+ years (joined 1983) Author: 3rd Edition of the Sample Slabs book, https://www.sampleslabs.info/
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
25397 Posts |
I screen-captured this post by the very wise Earle42. He was replying to someone who thought every coin they had was an error, but the same approach applies to bank notes as well. 
Inordinately fascinated by bits of metal with strange markings and figures
|
|
Moderator
 United States
15466 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
992 Posts |
I'm with Steve and the frog.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
235 Posts |
Looks thoroughly "messed" with
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
@Jacuzzi - Best thing to do at this point is submit it for authentication and grading. If you're correct, I'll quickly apologize. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2282 Posts |
My first thought was it's been tampered with.
You realize when you know how to think, it empowers you far beyond those who know only what to think.
-Neil deGrasse Tyson
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1648 Posts |
Cool looking note. At the moment I agree with Steve in Tampa. The main reason (as I'm learning ongoing...) I have read that the new LEPE overprinting lines print all the left-hand serials from one drum, and all the right-hand serials from a second drum. So it's entirely possible for the left and right serials to be different colors since 2013 on the $1 but for this note that would make an identical printed serial number error like this one seem impossible for that reason. Perhaps also depending how they refill the ink, if one side were to be refilled at a different time this could potentially cause slight coloration differences in the two sides like one side is darker or even one side being missing, but not both. Example: https://www.numismaticnews.net/pape...r-discovered
Edited by datadragon 06/07/2023 6:43 pm
|
|
Moderator
 Australia
16844 Posts |
The simultaneous "missing last digits" is indeed very, very suspicious. I'd tend to assume a Q-tip and some solvent, rather than an eraser, but I'll admit I've never tried either so I don't know what the results of either would look like.
I'm leaning towards "solvent", only because solvent can also explain some of the other features on the note (like the ink bleedthroughs).
Don't say "infinitely" when you mean "very"; otherwise, you'll have no word left when you want to talk about something really infinite. - C. S. Lewis
|
|
Moderator
 Australia
16844 Posts |
Quote: I've Never Counted This Many Errors On A Bill How Did This Get Make Circulation As a general rule, the answer to this question is "it didn't". If you find "multiple errors" on a coin or note, 99.5% of the time, it's usually just one "error" or event that has caused all of the differences. Which is why I'm suspecting "solvent" for this note, as it would be a single "event" that can explain all the "wrong features". Occam's Razor says that if one event happening to a note is improbable, then having multiple improbable events happen to the same note simultaneously is extra-improbable. Not impossible, just really, really, really unlikely. And, as another general rule: if you find "spectacular errors" on a well-circulated note, the chances are highest that those "errors" were not there while that note saw that heavy circulation - somebody else would have spotted it earlier and kept it, or somebody in a bank would have flagged it as "unfit for reissue" and destroyed it, long before it got to you.
Don't say "infinitely" when you mean "very"; otherwise, you'll have no word left when you want to talk about something really infinite. - C. S. Lewis
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
To me a bum note, but repeat that OP has to sbmit this for verification. 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
25397 Posts |
Once it's back from PMG or PCGS, OP will have the last laugh on us. Or something like that.
Inordinately fascinated by bits of metal with strange markings and figures
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1648 Posts |
Again the left and right serials are printed separately since 2013 with the new process and therefore its not possible to have this error. There is no need to submit.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 24 / Views: 2,150 |
Page 2 of 2
|