| Author |
 Replies: 25 / Views: 1,082 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
Quote:
So it's a "buy the coin not the slab" situation for this one. Not just that one all slabbed coins. John1  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1519 Posts |
To me it is a 64, I like the toning. That deep mark under the eye is unfortunate.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18696 Posts |
92(P) are typically weakly struck. I think this one is better than you normally see from that standpoint. the photos are not the best as they are a little small and the obv has some shadowing so it makes it difficult to see if the luster is broken. to me it looks that way. based on that I think its a MS63 coin. reverse is a little stronger so it could be close enough to a 64 but breaks in luster is going to hold it back. can only go by what the photos show
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1776 Posts |
Deep mark on the cheek holds this to a 63. Graded as a 62 would not surprise me. That is the prime focal area.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4989 Posts |
ICG graded this one an MS-62. Don't have it in hand yet but based on the photos I thought it was a 64. It was priced near wholesale for a 62 so unless it's an AU-58 slider in hand I think I got a good deal.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
Got the coin in hand today. Pretty much as expected. Good cartwheel luster and no nasty surprises.   Edited by fenton
06/01/2024 7:27 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36844 Posts |
You did good. I'm still at MS-63 on this one.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1519 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2596 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18696 Posts |
using the new photo I think there is too much luster gone from the coin. I would call it MS62 and a good call from ICG which is not common
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12057 Posts |
I think it's a 63 minimum.
Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890 "Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Sure looks better than a 62 to me.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
I think if I submitted it raw to NGC or PCGS it would get a 63. Crossover might be tough because it's an uncommon date and I think the ICG holder would, much as they say it wouldn't, bias the opinion somewhat.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1095 Posts |
I would say MS64. Do we have an ICG grade on this one?
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 25 / Views: 1,082 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 05/29/2024 08:40 am
