| Author |
Replies: 31 / Views: 2,363 |
Page 3 of 3
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1780 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7174 Posts |
That's way underweight. That would almost be the weight for missing both clad layers. I can't explain why it is struck up as good as it is. Wait for more replies.
|
|
New Member
 United States
17 Posts |
Yeah, I don't know what is going on with this coin!
|
|
New Member
 United States
17 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
6554 Posts |
Just a thought: if you are handling valuable coins, you don't want to leave fingerprints on the coin faces. Handle it by the edge, or wear gloves.
|
|
New Member
 United States
17 Posts |
Noted. Thanks for the advice, gloves are now on the list. Anything to add about the coin?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5785 Posts |
That's definitely a keeper. Congrats on the find.
Being that much underweight makes me wonder if part of the copper core was lost when the clad layer came off.
I'm with Cujohn about how well the details struck up on that one for being so underweight. Normally when a coin is missing metal, there isn't enough metal to fill all the devices when it is struck by the dies.
Words of encouragement are one of the major food groups. We need to consume them regularly to thrive and grow.
|
|
New Member
 United States
17 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7174 Posts |
If it was mine, I would bite the bullet and send it into ANACS. Theye'd be the cheapest. That lite weight has to be missing both layers. I still can't explain the sharpness of the strike. Be sure to come back and post the results.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
6554 Posts |
Unless I am missing something, it's missing about 0.4g of the expected 2.27g mass. Why would it have to be missing both layers?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7174 Posts |
That's the weight of both clad layers.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
6554 Posts |
By ratios, the two clad layers combined are about one-third the total coin mass. That would make each clad layer about 0.378 grams (2.27g/6).
Graded examples of clad dimes missing a single clad layer seem to be between 1.7g-1.8g. So this coin is right on the money.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
97379 Posts |
oh, sorry, I lost track of this topic Elvira.
But I think that your coin is within the parameters of a single loss of a clad surface (maybe a tad lighter than expected, but a nice find!
|
|
New Member
 United States
17 Posts |
Thanks everyone! Do you think it's worth sending in? I am curious about it, I do have some 1970 and 1971 quarters in amazing condition I could send in with it, just to see... what kind of mylar flips do you use to send in coins? I see they don't like the cardboard ones, staples or tape.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
6554 Posts |
Elvira, are you going to sell it? Because that's the main reason to have a mint error coin graded. The sold prices for missing clad error coins on ebay range from $100 to several hundred dollars. In your case, I think 1965 works strongly in your favor, because that's the very first year of clad dimes. But depending on how much you spend for grading, you might not make any money on the sale. It's also pretty clear that some ebay auctions made good money, and some sold for like $35-50.
|
|
Page 3 of 3
|
Replies: 31 / Views: 2,363 |
Page 3 of 3
|