| Author |
 Replies: 16 / Views: 2,732 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
65 Posts |
id say both about AU-50 maybe more on the 1880 great coins
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2150 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
851 Posts |
The 1879 S graded MS65 PL but the 1880 S graded only MS65. Do you think there was a mistake?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2150 Posts |
No I think those are both fair grades, I'm always conservative in my grades.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2150 Posts |
From the pics the 1880 actually looks more proof like, what holder are they in?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
851 Posts |
The 1880 S is in a PCGS CAC holder.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23731 Posts |
Those are two beauties. I would grade both at least MS-63, with the 1880 possibly going as high as MS-65.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2150 Posts |
Is the 79s pcgs graded also?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
851 Posts |
Yes  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2150 Posts |
I think the 1880 should have graded PL, at least thats how I feel lokking at the pictures. What do you think?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
851 Posts |
Yea thats what I was thinking. I bought it in hopes of it possibly resubmitting as a PL. I think the coin is just beautiful. I paid $150 for it. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2150 Posts |
I would resubmit for sure, if you could get it returned proof like you could tack at least another $75 on top of that price. And I think you have a really good chance.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2150 Posts |
Regardless two great additions to your collection. Congrats!!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1691 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
4849 Posts |
I agree with the 65 grade on each, and think they are beautiful coins!
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,732 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 09/27/2009 5:20 pm
