| Author |
 Replies: 16 / Views: 2,408 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
15519 Posts |
There is no way we can give an honest opinion on grade with these photos ...
Show us full-size photos of the coin itself and we can help.
Glad you are happy with it ... just know that it's highly unlikely to be a true MS67 coin in the 3rd tier graders holder.
David
|
|
Valued Member
 Canada
138 Posts |
Better photo will be up soon.
And yes I though the grading could be a bit high, that's why I would
like more opinions from those who know better than me
Thanks
Alan
Edited by acan451
02/10/2011 9:55 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2448 Posts |
Looks like it has a great luster, but I'm afraid it's to difficult to grade or make any determination because of the small pics. It sure looks good from here. BINP.
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
138 Posts |
Greetings all
I am trying to take pictures of this coin and others, using a digital camera with zoom.
My question is would it be better to scan the coins. I am trying to get the best picture quality possible
Thanks
Alan
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
138 Posts |
Hello I think I have solved my picture problem. I will upload more as soon as I can. Thanks for your grading expertise Alan  Edited by acan451
02/14/2011 7:36 pm
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
4849 Posts |
Is this the same coin as in the other thread? At first I thought they were 2 different coins, but now I'm thinking they were the same one. We only need one thread. Anyways, I dont think it would grade above 62 with the splotches and those hits(it may squeak a 63). It has nice luster.
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
138 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
138 Posts |
Yea its the same coin and thanks for the help
Alan
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
MS-63
EDIT: Good example of why one shouldn't grade from small photos the detail is critical to see hairlines, nicks, and other marks.
Edited by fenton
02/15/2011 08:25 am
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
138 Posts |
Edited by acan451
02/16/2011 12:30 am
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
5375 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3076 Posts |
I might go AU58 tops...but the photo's are still to blurry might think its MS as with these grading companies will clean the coin...and over grade..if your looking for shine....then the coin has it,, but there's not enough for details to know what it is...WAKE UP!! these companies slab CRAP....they are problem coins no one else will grade...melt value...
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
5375 Posts |
This coin still has nice luster...usually you can tell whether AU or MS by that. They've definitely overgraded it but you can sometimes find decent coins in junk slabs...they're just not the grade stated.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3076 Posts |
I will agree with you there, but I often see problem coins...especially cleaned coins...from these Bottom slabbers...
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
9104 Posts |
all the nicks would keep it 63 or lower. ncc could remove the cloudiness, but for the cost, you could prolly get a 65 without nicks.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,408 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 02/10/2011 9:51 pm
