| Author |
Replies: 8 / Views: 171 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
442 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
77790 Posts |
Not seeing any errors at all. Just seeing damage from circulation.
Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
222 Posts |
There are some other examples of this souvenir on tokencatalog.com registered under TokenCatalog #166852
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
21831 Posts |
Damage and a couple of die chips but no errors.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
27070 Posts |
It's also listed on Numista: https://en.numista.com/39853I have several different versions of this souvenir token, in both brass and aluminum. They are quite common.
Inordinately fascinated by bits of metal with strange markings and figures
|
|
Moderator
 Australia
16952 Posts |
Quote: ... I was wondering what the year was that this was created... Since this question hasn't yet been answered either in previous posts or on the Numista page, I would answer that the statue of Ben Franklin in the Institute's rotunda wasn't officially designated as the "Benjamin Franklin National Memorial" until 1972, and since it's called the "Memorial" on the medal I suspect this is your earliest possible date - though of course may have been sold as a souvenir over many years or even decades. I would assume it was actually sold as a souvenir there at the Franklin Institute. "Errors" on medals generally aren't as interesting or valuable to collectors, since quality control at a private medal-maker is not expected to be as high as a government mint. There's also nothing stopping a private medal-maker from deliberately making as many "errors" as the market wants. Low demand, and potentially unlimited supply. It would have to be a particularly egregious error (such as mis-spelling his name "Fraklnin" or some such) to get any premium as an error/variety. Quote: ...Just seeing damage from circulation. Technically, since it's not a coin, does not really resemble a circulating coin, and therefore almost certainly didn't "circulate" in the economic sense, we'd normally call it "wear" rather than "circulation". It is very strangely worn though, for an item that theoretically should not have seen this much wear - perhaps someone used it as a pocket piece, or had it jingling around in a coin tray in a car or some such for many years.
Don't say "infinitely" when you mean "very"; otherwise, you'll have no word left when you want to talk about something really infinite. - C. S. Lewis
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
77790 Posts |
Quote: Technically, since it's not a coin, does not really resemble a circulating coin, and therefore almost certainly didn't "circulate" in the economic sense, we'd normally call it "wear" rather than "circulation". It is very strangely worn though, for an item that theoretically should not have seen this much wear - perhaps someone used it as a pocket piece, or had it jingling around in a coin tray in a car or some such for many years. Very good point, Sap. 
Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
193971 Posts |
Quote: perhaps someone used it as a pocket piece, or had it jingling around in a coin tray in a car or some such for many years. 
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
442 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 8 / Views: 171 |
|