Quote:
...angling the coin is an integral part of the final effect, which I simply cannot achieve with a flat shot. You won't get light coverage/detail definition as you see here otherwise.
...angling the coin is an integral part of the final effect, which I simply cannot achieve with a flat shot. You won't get light coverage/detail definition as you see here otherwise.
There are many other techniques available that will give you good coverage with a flat shot. I also assume you're using "Flat" picture control on the D810, which helps quite a lot with this by compressing dynamic range better than other picture controls.
I completely agree that if an axial lighting effect is desired, then tilting the coin and accepting the need either for focus stacking or employing tilt/shift techniques is a necessary evil. But because of the added expense and/or labor for every shot, tilting is not a good technique to recommend for everyday shots not requiring axial lighting.
One thing folks should also realize is that the adage 'pixels are free' goes away with focus stacking. For example, let's take DVC's D810 as the example. The camera is good for perhaps 200k shutter actuations, so each actuation costs $3300/200k = 1.65 cents per shot. This is essentiall "free" by many folks' standards. But for the example above with 36 stacked shots, each final image will cost 59.4 cents, certainly not "free", and reduces the life of the camera to 5555 images.
Contact me for photographic equipment or visit my home page at:
http://macrocoins.com
http://macrocoins.com






















