Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
300,000 items to help build your collection! Specializing in Modern Numismatics Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsJoin Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes.








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Guess The Morgan Grade

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 21 / Views: 1,914Next Topic
Page: of 2
Rest in Peace
dave700x's Avatar
United States
10625 Posts
 Posted 07/19/2018  08:38 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add dave700x to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I was going to ask for better images. Tough to grade a toned coin such as this one from these static images.
Pillar of the Community
jimbucks's Avatar
United States
4692 Posts
 Posted 07/19/2018  1:14 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jimbucks to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Well, here is the answer. The image quality is what Heritage provided at time of auction, with only the 2 images. Makes me wonder if the Seller was aware of this.

Needless to say, it sold at a discount to the same date and grade with better eye appeal at the time of auction.


Guess-The-Morgan-Grade
Bedrock of the Community
numismatic student's Avatar
United States
11902 Posts
 Posted 07/19/2018  1:19 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add numismatic student to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Looks overgraded. Imho, coins with such weak strikes should not grade gem. The hair is flat above the ear and in other parts of the hair, detail is missing. That is not an issue about eye appeal, but an objective issue about the quality of the coin.
Pillar of the Community
nfine's Avatar
United States
3477 Posts
 Posted 07/19/2018  1:32 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add nfine to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
with what NS said.
Rest in Peace
dave700x's Avatar
United States
10625 Posts
 Posted 07/19/2018  1:33 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add dave700x to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I can't say if it's over-graded or even under-graded but I sure wouldn't have paid MS66 money for it based on these images and you didn't...
Valued Member
jmwilson's Avatar
240 Posts
 Posted 07/20/2018  10:25 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jmwilson to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Nailed it!

Like I said... I've seen this before. The eye appeal is lacking. However, the coin doesn't have lots of bag marks. Had the toning been "pretty" it would have sold at a premium rather than a discount.

The problem is that as humans we mix the subjective with the objective all the time (and it's hard to separate them). Also, we need a better grading system. Something with separate categories.


If PCGS offers a conservation service and would honor at least the same grade ... it might benefit.


  Previous TopicReplies: 21 / Views: 1,914Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.27 seconds to rattle this change. Forums