@moneypenney
I don't disagree but I am not sure that significant premiums will ever be retained long term. Remember past furors: Aviation Series 1: Lancaster, Swarovski Crystal Snowflakes, even the mighty Ladybug/Tulip is now declining 10 years in. Among the few silver coins I see that appear to be retaining premiums are the 2007 Silver Proof Loons from the Baby giftware sets.
I think the challenge is that there are competing motivations; business, investor and collector. The
RCM is a business and like most businesses, they make money by selling their product for the most that the market will bear. I think this is an attempt by the
RCM to test the market... Higher Price, Higher Mintage may expose the limits of the market. As I noted above they already had a rollback on the 1oz Gold dropping 5% between May and July. It is what I would do were I selling trinket commodities.
The investor/speculator motivation is to buy an item and watch it appreciate in value before it is sold. Investor/speculators will sell the minute they think they can realise the profit target they want to achieve. Conversely, the investor/speculator is part of the problem... If an investor gets their hands on a higher quantity of items and they can't sell at profit, they will drop their price and take a loss to prop up their cashflow rather than hold... It is this speculation that has driven the mint into producing thousands of units of a given design.
NCLT is a dud from an investor/speculator perspective. The "hits" are too rare and the investment goal is not actively supported by the
RCM. If it were, there would be a lot more sub 100 or 500 mintages and not only at $100K+ price point.
The collector motivation is to grow their collection with items that appeal and are aligned with the direction of their collection; most collectors won't sell or will do so rarely.
The collector motivation is supported by the
RCM by offering a breadth of product that is of high quality, innovates and has interesting design... They are known to miss (How many moose or maple leaf or grizzly bear images can we support)... they also miss on quality from time to time... The golden toning on silver coins has become a recurring issue... I have a few and it is not environmental as they are stored right next to coins that don't exhibit this... Oh and the UK
Royal Mint also has this issue. That said, the
RCM NCLT group is focused on collectors... they recognise that the market is fragile but there is some elasticity... I think they are just testing the current boundaries.
As an aside... this phenomenon is not unique to the
RCM or even NCLT collecting. Take a look at rare guitars (my other vice). The 1959 Gibson Les Paul is a classic and when available at auction will go for 6 digits if not 7 if there is a great pedigree. Gibson release 1959 reissue guitars annually with sale prices from $5,000CDN -$15,000CDN. There is no shortage of these re-issue guitars but on sites like Reverb (Think
ebay for musical instruments) they are routinely selling for premiums over the initial sale price. It is a bubble whose burst point is past due. In another parallel... there are even forgeries to contend with...
All I am saying is that the
RCM NCLT group like the Gibson Reissue group is a business that caters to collectors not investors. It is investors who confuse the market demand and lead the
RCM into producing more than the collector market will ultimately bear resulting in a crash to bullion values where NCLT can become legitimate investor product. All you have to do is look at $100 and $200 gold issued prior to 1990... It all sells at bullion equivalent... albeit a premium over issue.