What Is Wrong With This Proof Set?!

I know that one -- "someone" needed some spending money, so they pilfered the 1932-D quarter that used to be there, the 3-legger buffalo, and the 1921-D half. Later on, they replaced the coins with something from their pocket change.

Honestly, wouldn't it make sense that there was originally a Franklin half in an assortment like this? I'm not that old (I like to think), and I remember running into Franklins when I was a kid all the time.

We are just lucky that that 1909-s has little face value.

OK I'm lost but I want to know the answer =)

The mint mark looks good to me. THe coin is authentic and a very nice grade, too bad about the scratches. Trade you for my 1877 IHC. Check it out I have 2 and I will be selling one. THe 1909 S will finish my Indian Heads.

how much soccer? you can e mail me If you want

oh yea I seen them..........

I saw the 1909-S indian but didn't know if that was what you were talking about or not. What I was talking about that I saw that was "wrong" with the proof set was that its not a proof set at all. The 1909-S is definitely Post Mint Damage but I know nothing about them to tell you if its authentic or anything like that but did recognize it as a rare date/mm. I don't know why someone would do that to the coin if it was real. I remember my grandfather saying he had found some coins like this and he felt the person did it on purpose so no one would want it in their collection. My grandfather was a little strange so you would have to really know him to understand the context this was said in. He hoarded everything including coins and auto parts from when he owned a service station in the 40's and 50's. he had every NOS belt,hose,tubs of grease and oil cans and even the lifts from his service station in one of the many storage buildings he had on his 6 acres of land

yes I'm working on it it might change