| Author |
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,874 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1745 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
987 Posts |
MS-63 and I'm not sure what qualifies a coin as "full steps". This one must be close though.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10284 Posts |
Possibly MS65 probably MS64 If it were a toss in horseshoes, I would say you have a "leaner" but not a ringer for full steps but they might have given it to you.For a guess at what grade it got I will take a long shot at MS65FS toned with a medium strike.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2424 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1388 Posts |
Remember it doesn't have to have full steps for a higher grade... I had a very similar one, and it was MS-66 by PCGS... MS-66 all the way 
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
MS66 - 4-1/2 steps. Nice looking Jefferson. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5854 Posts |
I will guess MS-65. Nice nickel!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
763 Posts |
Thanks for all of the grades. Here is the ANACS grade:  I think it has an outside chance at crossing to MS65FS at PCGS. I only paid about $30 for it so I am planning on including it with my next crossover submission. These really jump up in value at 65FS and 66FS so I think it is worth the gamble. I'll share my results here.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3229 Posts |
Sorry I am late tothe party. Just wanted to say: Very nice! Thanks for sharing! 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2424 Posts |
woohoo I was right, right? is 5 steps full steps?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2424 Posts |
i agree laywer.
it looks FS to me. BUT there seems to be a smudge at the last/first step. the one closest to MONTICELLO, above the "T".
but other than that. reason is, I just received a PCGS MS66 45-d from another ccf member and it has a similar smudge on the bottom steps. it did not receive a full step. but yours does look a bit cleaner than mine
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
763 Posts |
SDcoinguy, PCGS requires 5 Full Steps for the FS designation. I see what you are referring to above the T, but I think that smudge prevented the coin from being 6FS. I am more concerned with the weakness on the 3rd step between the T and I. For those of you that are interested, here is a link to a great explanation of the full steps designation that I find helpful: http://varietynickels.com/pages/jef...ll-steps.php
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
Are you going to stipulate not to crack it open if it doesn't meet the grade you're looking for?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
763 Posts |
Quote: Are you going to stipulate not to crack it open if it doesn't meet the grade you're looking for? Yes, I will state that it has to meet a minimum of MS65FS on my crossover submission. If it doesn't, they will send it back to me unopened in the ANACS slab.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9796 Posts |
Too late also I was going to say MS66 4.5 steps - nice looking nickel!
"Buy the Book Before You Buy the Coin" - Aaron R. Feldman - "And read it" - Me 2013! ANA Life Member #3288 in good standing since 1981, ANS, Early American Coppers Member (EAC), Colonial Coin Collectors Club member (C4), Conder Token Collector Club member (CTCC), Civil War Token Society (CWTS) member, Liberty Seated Collectors Club (LSCC) & Numismatic Bibliomania Society member (NBS), USMex, Member in good standing, 2¢ variety collector. See my want page: http://goccf.com/t/140440
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,874 |
Page 2 of 2
|