| Author |
 Replies: 168 / Views: 18,241 |
|
|
|
|
New Member
Australia
45 Posts |
YES GREAT MEMORY!! I would say the grade is ef, the note I have had now for around ten years and its the pride of the fleet.
I must add I found it very hard to find the last prefix 1997 twenty dollar note (GB97) but after call to mr trevor wilkins and a little time job complete.
Now the twentys are complete I'm thinking of starting the ten I'm sure there will be some hard ones to find there!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
1244 Posts |
Check out my notes... >> Trade link below for people who haven't negotiated the rest of the forum. Yes there is a trade section and a want section. Apple there is another section you should look for it in the forum, ill bump it for you, lets see if you can find it  |
|
Valued Member
Australia
363 Posts |
I almost forgot about this note - 1983 Johnston/Stone No idea about the stamp....  |
|
Valued Member
Australia
428 Posts |
these got wet I think  ,, kel ,, |
|
Valued Member
Australia
428 Posts |
i have 2 of these numbered ab 33 484706 and ab 33 376502 ..  Edited by keldaw2222
12/05/2012 6:50 pm
|
|
Valued Member
Australia
428 Posts |
i think this got wet and then dried out , I have 3 of them ..same condition ..,, kel ,,  Edited by keldaw2222
12/05/2012 6:48 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
4411 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
Australia
428 Posts |
 on my 2 x 1988 x $10.00 notes ab 33 last prefix first issue pic shown above . macdonald,s book has them as vf $ 550==as f $ 250.00 mine in this wavie condition what price do you think they would be worth , any idea of price i have them in a heavy book trying to flatten them down as much as I can .. does condition mean (unc ) perfectly flat and clean and never changed hands from new , and ( f )mean been in circulation and used .ok mine are unc and never been used so should have no dirt or scratches , but were stored ,,, rolled and placed in a glass bottle ,does that mean they are still unc but not in perfect condition , I know it is a bit confusing but they are the best valued notes from 1988 . first issue , last prefix 1988 notes.opinions please and be nice because it is be kind to ,,kel ,, week next week..  Edited by keldaw2222
12/06/2012 5:50 pm
|
|
Valued Member
Australia
363 Posts |
keldaw2222, the 1988 polymers aren't the last prefix. The notes need a 93, 94 or 96 after the AB33 to be first issue.
|
|
Valued Member
Australia
428 Posts |
spg1 thankyou for letting me know that , now I feel like a real goose ..
,,kel ,,
|
|
Valued Member
Australia
428 Posts |
SPG1 , this is what I went by , dont you think it is a bit confusing , like it got me confused , doesn,t really matter because the notes are far from being unc condition but I just saw ab 33 last prefix and (first release ) and that is what I went by 250= 550 and so on , so was confusing for me for sure ..,, kel,,  Edited by keldaw2222
12/09/2012 01:26 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
2180 Posts |
There was a recent Australasian Coin and Banknote Magazine article which I think said that the catalogues are somehow not clear about first/last prefixes for the 1988 $10.
|
|
Valued Member
Australia
363 Posts |
Yeah, it's a little confusing & it took me a bit to get my head around it. So basically if the note has a 93, 94, or 96 after the prefix and first two numbers, it's a first release note:
AB10 93 xxxx
AB11 94 xxxx
AB12 96 xxxx
Or second relese:
AB10 12 xxxx
AB11 34 xxxx
AB12 45 xxxx
The difference is the third & fourth numbers.
Hope this helps. Cheers. Simon.
|
|
Valued Member
Australia
428 Posts |
 thanks simon the other 4 I got are mine,i went to the reserve bank when they came out in 1988 .. they would only allow us to get 4 only so mine are still as I got them and the numbers are AB 24 964753 , 4 , 5 , 6 ,.. I know they are the first issue , because I got them on the first day of release from the reserve bank in brisbane .. ,, kel ,, |
|
Valued Member
Australia
428 Posts |
|
|
|
Replies: 168 / Views: 18,241 |
|
First Page
Previous Page
Posted 08/29/2012 9:57 pm
