| Author |
Replies: 77 / Views: 7,026 |
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
470 Posts |
quote me so as to not cause confusion.
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
161 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
197 Posts |
No, they don't look cleaned, but why would anyone even consider cleaning either of them? They were minted in the megamillions and even AU's are can be had for less than a dollar.
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
161 Posts |
Thanks for your opinion Bill. However don't you think the color doesn't match the year and wearing? Normally a coin that age will be deep brown or even black.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
548 Posts |
Normally perhaps, but not all.
|
|
Valued Member
197 Posts |
Wandering .. Yes, they look light and maybe cleaned, but you can tell anything by a scan/photo. It could be camera glare, light source direction, scanner setting, photoshop enhancements or anything else. You can't grade anything or see what's what on a computer monitor unless you have the coin in hand as well.
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
161 Posts |
I took the photo so I can say the real coin is as good as photo shows -- no scratch, no chemical dull, no polish, just the color is "unreal". Do you think TPGs will reject them?
|
|
Valued Member
197 Posts |
My personal opinion is that a TPG would be out of the question for those coins. They are worth $1 or so and it would cost $15-$20 to get them certified each. The cert cost will be way more than they will ever be worth for at least the next 100 years. Go to a coin show and pick up a couple AU's or low MS's for less than $10 total for the pair. You'll be better off. They look cleaned to me .. cleaning doesn't necessarily make them dull.
|
|
Moderator
 Canada
10460 Posts |
The Canadian coin (1948 example above) is most definitely cleaned. Unless it is a 1939, 1940, 1949, 1950 or 1952, almost all George VI 1-cent coins have a deep lustrous orange colour, even the specimen strikes and higher mint state grades. In fact, it is almost impossible to find a 1948 A-between denticles 1-cent in what PCGS would call "Red". Most have acquired a wine-coloured toning, probably from impurities in the coin itself.
"Discovery follows discovery, each both raising and answering questions, each ending a long search, and each providing the new instruments for a new search." -- J. Robert OppenheimerContent of this post is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses...0/deed.en_USMy eBay store
Edited by SPP-Ottawa 03/07/2013 08:12 am
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
10743 Posts |
The Lincoln has been cleaned too.
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
161 Posts |
So my summary of understanding is, scratches, chemical dull and unreal color, all of them can be treated as cleaned coin and be rejected by TPGs.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1700 Posts |
wandering, in my opinion, they are cleaned. It is impossible for a coin that old (I mean the wear) with to have that much shine. Plus, as I've cleaned my own coins before, I know that the toning in between the beads and the rim don't come off so quickly. That's my second supporting statement. The toning is uneven in various spots. In some spots the toning is orange (not normal. normal toning should be red) whereas in some spots the colour is brown. The demonstrates the usage of water. Cleaned circulated coins cannot be graded "red" as it is a term for AU and BU coins; therefore, TPG don't bother sending unjust opinions about these cleaned coins. This was my very first lesson on the Coin Community Forum. https://goccf.com/t/104259After I cleaned the coins, I discovered that there was no way to clean the beads and restore permenant natural lustre. Most importantly, the wear is never in accord with the lustre.
Edited by Petersun 03/07/2013 7:09 pm
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
457 Posts |
Myself I've only ever cleaned one coin.... My kids had a few bucks and bought me a lump of green stuff off ebay for X-Mass one year. They were told it was a recovered Greek coin, buried for 1000's of years. I soaked it in olive oil for months trying to find out what was inside   it is a Greek or roman copper coin  bright and shiny now lol
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
457 Posts |
On a more serious note on this subject though... If you have ANY coin that was not sealed the second it was minted in an airtight capsule or compound it has been cleaned and polished many, many, many times. Every time it was handled to buy something it was removed from one pocket and dropped in to an other. There is no way you can ever have a coin in original condition that has not been cleaned.  I think it might also be said that the system myself and many others on here have adopted, taking mint sets apart and hermetically sealing them in 2x2's and capsule's is just as bad as cleaning .... hundreds of years from now you will have a coin without natural colour or toning.    On a less serious note .... my wife has wash LOTS of coins ... dried em to  I think the only coins ( if you can call them that ) that should be sealed and should never be handled or washed with soap and water are the trinkets or granny bate that the mint put out in huge numbers, NCLT , the only reason you don't clean them is because they aren't coins they are art.
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
161 Posts |
Falcon, thank your frank opinion. I agree with it. For a circulation coin, how could daily usage, put them into your pocket with your keys and other coins, handle them with anything from sweat to ketchup on hand, forget taking out from pocket for laundry, all of them are less harmful than cleaning? How could a coin survived all of them still have some value but become worthless after cleaning? I feel it's not a logic thing talking about cleaning. It's more like a taboo or religious things -- we are not only talking about the real damage cleaning harm to a coin, we think the cleaning itself is evil and no matter what it real did on coin. For the two coins I posted here, even now I know they are cleaned, I'll still treasure them and never be stupid enough to retone or renaturize it. The reason is simple: I didn't see really damage on it.
|
|
|
Replies: 77 / Views: 7,026 |
|