| Author |
 Replies: 17 / Views: 11,638 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
If you have images it would help a lot. But along with these include images of the next to rim areas. They have been making to coins into one with different year obverses or reverses to make a WAM when it should not be one. The rim area gives it away. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2651 Posts |
Whats the purpose of not posting pictures in the first place? But I'll bite.....Sure lets see some pics!  to the forum  Edited by Jayman931
09/28/2013 12:18 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
One good still picture beats a video (Especially since most amateur cion videos can't keep the camera still or the coin in focus. )
|
|
New Member
 Canada
2 Posts |
Hi guys. Thanks for the welcome.  Here are the pics. (by the way my other name is not JOSH1999)  Enjoy... 'Patience is a virtue... especially while looking through a loop'     |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
That is a Close AM. Note the M is not centered as it would be on a Wide AM?  |
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
838 Posts |
Hi Cointucky Derby. I think your coin is a weakly struck Close AM -- sorry. My evidence for this is that "MER" should be about equally spaced on a true Wide AM, while in your coin "M ER" has the "E" closer to the "R". This is consistent with a Close AM reverse. It is best to think of Wide AM versus Close AM by placing the "M" in between the two surrounding letters. Too many people just focus on the left-hand neighbour -- the "A". Anyhow, check for yourself with a pre-1992 and a standard post-1993 cent. I hope I am wrong, but I suspect you will see what I'm talking about. It is well known that Die Deterioration leads to false positives for wide AMs, even for the standard dates of 1998-2000. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2651 Posts |
It is also evident by the FG that it is a Close AM. I was hoping it was a WAM... Happy Hunting! |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
500 Posts |
It looks like a CAM to me, the initials are too far for the WAM, and the AM gap is significantly smaller than the ME gap. Edit: that's what I get for forgetting to hit the post button right away!  Edited by Dasaki
09/28/2013 2:00 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3345 Posts |
Its got a far FG consistent with CAM. But the A and M look like Wide to me. But coop is a lot more knowledgeable than I am.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
207 Posts |
This is not a WAM. It's not about the space between AM. It never was. it's about the two spaces on both sides of the M. Coop's photo shows proper distinction. btw... Maybe it's the labels of " Wide AM" and " Close AM" that confuses people? Perhaps these should be renamed "Centered M" and "Offset M", respectively. Just throwing out some ideas. Edited by coinaki
09/28/2013 5:46 pm
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
3039 Posts |
I agree with all above. It's a typical newbie mistake, sorry.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
I agree with CAM not a WAM. John1  |
|
Moderator
United States
15472 Posts |
... Hopeful you stick around and enjoy the experts at this best of all coin forums. Agreed with the experts above ... this is a CAM reverse cent. There is a third diagnostic not yet mentioned that differentiates CAM vs WAM reverse ... spacing of the letters in the legend STATES. This diagnostic focuses on the relative spacing of the letters TAT in that legend. On a WAM reverse, the A is fully centered between the corresponding letters T On an CAM reverse, the A is clearly off-center and shifted towards the final letter T. The OP coin clearly shows a CAM diagnostic in STATES. Sooo .. in summary ... three key diagnostic that I know of for a WAM/CAM reverse ... 1. Relative spacing between the letters AME in AMERICA 2. Relative spacing of the letters TAT in STATES 3. Location of the designer initials. Agreed that the OP coin shows a gap in the AM location ... likely due to die wear creating a space ... however that feature alone does not make the coin a WAM reverse. David Edited for spllgneing Edited by nickelsearcher
09/28/2013 5:22 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Here is what David is referring to:  |
|
Valued Member
164 Posts |
If I were u,,,take the penny to few of the local coin shops or a coin show would be best.Looks like too much space on one side closest to the E,and the FG does not look right but its not a 1999-2000 so maybe its not worn die or struck weak,,does not look struck weak or a worn die,,looks like a WAM to me but listen to the guy with the pics here but at the same time let a few other people in person see it,Have a great day,,,Cosmos Edited by cosmoscoins
09/29/2013 07:06 am
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 17 / Views: 11,638 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 09/28/2013 12:18 pm
