| Author |
Replies: 25 / Views: 3,395 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
15522 Posts |
I'll start with the punch line ... then explain .. Based on my roll-search data there are approximately 1.833 billion Lincoln wheat cents in circulation today.  It might be helpful if you read my long ago post on the statistics behind the concept I dubbed 'circulation obsolescence' ... this is the tool that roll searches can use to answer questions such as yours. http://www.coincommunity.com/forum/...PIC_ID=58454To the data ... admit my weakness is only 54,750 Lincoln cents searched ... not a large enough data set (21.5+ boxes) to make conclusive statements. But is should be enough data to answer your question ... I find Wheaties ( LWC) at a rate of 0.39% ... The total population of all Wheaties minted 1909-1958 is 25,817,950,007 coins ... call it 25.818 billion and I will round off going forward in this post. The Lincoln memorial cents added another 427.507 billion coins ... The 2009- 2012 Lincoln cents have already added an astonishing 17.679 billion coins ... note that within 2 years the total mintage of Lincoln cents post 2008 will exceed the entire mintage of all 50 years of wheat cents.  Anyways ... total mintage of all Lincoln cents ever struck through 2012 is 471.003 billion coins ... of which the Wheaties comprise 5.48% of the total mintage. Did you read my post on circulation obsolescence.  The LWC has a circulation obsolescence of 92.9% .... meaning 7.1% are still in circulation ... hence my estimate of 1.833 billion coins still waiting to be found. Ask me again when my data set is 500,00 coins.  Enjoy David
|
|
Moderator
 United States
15522 Posts |
Geepers ... hopeful my reply did not stifle the discussion in this thread ....
I have my data and shared it, along with a logical conclusion based on math and real roll-find experience.
Hopeful the thread can continue with other input ... in no way am I claiming that I am correct with my limited sample of roll-found cents.
David
Take a look at my other hobby ... http://www.jk-dk.art
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2368 Posts |
Of course you didn't stifle the discussion, nickelsearcher. You have enhanced it. Didn't mean to be slow to reply, later on in the afternoon got busy for me. I did a similar estimate but didn't factor in the continuing mintage of new coins. I estimated a 3.85% survival rate. Again, sorry to respond so late. 
|
|
Valued Member
United States
140 Posts |
I love stats and running these types of numbers. Nickelsearcher your stats is a great input into this conversation.
My box searches have just started within the past month and a half. Very interesting to hear others data
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4594 Posts |
Figures never lie and liars never figure, nah nah... BIG GRIN. But no, I doubt most of us knew of a 2.5 year old post. Yes, NS, that's about what we are trying to do.
We all realize that year over year some percentage of the survivors are found and saved. So in 2.5 years or five years or decade from now we would expect to see the percentage decline relative to the injection of new coins (current mintage) and the extraction of what's being pulled out of circulation by wear and tear, ordinary losses and CRH.
Keeping this to a smaller period than "all my searching" gives us nearly point-in-time data. But my data or WheatChaser's or whomevers data individually is useless. It depends on the specific sourcing of the bank(s) we use, etc. so without many people's data you can't tell if what one person is seeing in one part of the country is really normal or is abnormal. So I offered to do some light weight analysis. With enough data you can expect (the law of large #s) that the average of the samples TENDS towards the average of the whole.
Although I make the mintage of wheats 24.7 billion (Numista data) or 5.3% of the total mintage through 2012. 158.2B Copper Wheats and a small amount of steelies (1B or 0.2% of the total 468B). Could be that I have 2012 #s where you have through 2009?
-----Burton 50+ year / Life / Emeritus ANA member (joined 12/1/1973) Life member: Numismatics International, CONECA Member: TNA, FtWCC, NETCC, EveryCountry (online) coin club Owned by three cats and a wife of 40+ years (joined 1983) Author: 3rd Edition of the Sample Slabs book, https://www.sampleslabs.info/
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1217 Posts |
Not to stir the pot, but has any thought been given to the hoards of wheats that are dumped back into circulation when someone passes away and the kids dump the Bucket load of wheats? I have personally hit a few of those myself. I realize its small, but that's one way the stock in circulation gets refreshed. Just trying to help and not being critical. Statistics is fascinating as a game.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2368 Posts |
Cbass, these hoards of wheats being dumped is one of the reasons cent roll hunting still exists. Without a continuing flow of wheat cents being added from circulation, the combination of newly minted cents and CRH pulls would drive the circulating wheat population down exponentially.
Now I'm not saying that dumped collections are the ONLY reason, just anyone with a coin jar containing a wheat or two cashing it in is contributing to a new pool of potential finds. They are out there, but not forever. We will reach the peak wheat crisis someday, but fortunately Wheaties are constantly being fed into circulation...
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1217 Posts |
i was trying to question whether you had figured any of that into the equations ya'll are running? there likely needs to be some sort of fudge factor when doing your math for replenishment. you seem to only be accounting for what disappears. or maybe I missed something.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2368 Posts |
The proof for our replenishment theory is the difference between actual find rates and the projected normal attrition at a fixed rate. There's a huge difference. BStrauss3 and I figured that in a perfect world where there was no hoarding or collection dumps and the wheat population depreciated at a fixed rate, by now there should be 1 wheat per 4000 cents.
As you can see by my poll, that is definitely not the case.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1217 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4594 Posts |
Absolutely... I suspect if we had true historical data the find rate would have drifted down until the advent of the coinstar type machines made it feasible to replenish the pot from everone's coin jars. ESPECIALLY the cent hoarders in a coffee can.
-----Burton 50+ year / Life / Emeritus ANA member (joined 12/1/1973) Life member: Numismatics International, CONECA Member: TNA, FtWCC, NETCC, EveryCountry (online) coin club Owned by three cats and a wife of 40+ years (joined 1983) Author: 3rd Edition of the Sample Slabs book, https://www.sampleslabs.info/
|
|
Moderator
 United States
15522 Posts |
Quote: The proof for our replenishment theory is the difference between actual find rates and the projected normal attrition at a fixed rate. I would enjoy reading both of your analysis on this topic ... replenishment supporting current find rates of LWC. I've shared my honest find statistics and my theory on 'circulation obsolescence' ... agreed that my data set is just one of many to add to the equation. Looking forward to any future updates where you might revise my estimate of LWC in circulation.  Appears so far that I am the only contributor to offer a number. That said ... you make a very strong statement on 'proof for our replenishment theory' ... I would very much enjoy viewing your data that supports this 'proof' ... how do you both know with verifiable data that replenishment is contributing to the current LWC circulating population?  David
Take a look at my other hobby ... http://www.jk-dk.art
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2368 Posts |
The truth is, there is no VERIFIABLE data for the replenishment, it is just a hypothesis. There is nothing else I can think of that would cause the Wheat cent find rates to be abnormally high EXCEPT replenishment. Any other logical theories would surprise me. And for our other data on this, it can be found on my thread called "I got a solid box of 2013s. Now what?" Could someone post a link? I haven't quite figured out how to do it on my tablet...  Real interesting stuff BStrauss and I came up with.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
519 Posts |
I average 3-4 wheat cents per box but I didn't add this to the poll.
Edited by o-train 11/30/2013 7:44 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
So far, the weighted average is a little over 10 LWC's per box, for all respondents.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 25 / Views: 3,395 |
Page 2 of 2
|