| Author |
 Replies: 17 / Views: 3,191 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
10743 Posts |
Wow.. Uncirculated, 4 feed backs, no returns...keep an eye on this one.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3453 Posts |
What are the red flags? I would never purchase a 1916D raw because I do not have the experience to do so but am interested to know what you see as flags in this coin.
Thanks!
|
|
Valued Member
United States
212 Posts |
I must be missing something.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
20753 Posts |
Lots of bids if fake, lots of suckers. Just can't see why anyone would have this and not have it authenticated. In that grade would pull a small fortune if graded and authenticated. I wonder if this one is real.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
212 Posts |
It's a beauty that's for sure. Almost too good to be true though. Spooky.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
53 Posts |
The D doesn't look right - does it? Also the surfaces seem a little grainy - my "mint" mercurys are pretty smooth (from the 30's and 40's anyway :-)
Amazing that folks would bid 4 figures on this based on the seller's newness and lack of authentication even though it is the key date.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1045 Posts |
Love his reassuring statement: "This coin has been examined by a coin expert to represent the facts I have listed" Phew, an unknown coin expert has examined the coin, now I feel all fuzzy and warm inside.  |
|
Valued Member
 United States
88 Posts |
My thinking is, the guy is brand new to ebay (one month), doesn't take Paypal as payment, had coin examined by ˝coin expert˝ with no paperwork as proof, only sold one other item as seller on ebay, and doesn't take returns. To my understanding, Denver used only 4 separate dies to manufacture this coin, it appears to have a lot more of variences (IMHO) compared to authentic examples we researched on this one. It just doesn't look right to me. As far as diagnostics are concerned, raised die marks on known examples are not showing up anywhere on this one. Just saying... |
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1823 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8521 Posts |
Looks like he got caught.
Oregon coin geek.....*** GO BEAVS ! ! ! ***
|
|
Valued Member
United States
88 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3453 Posts |
Hello! I do not mean to nag but on the coin, what were the details that were the red flag?  |
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2364 Posts |
I'm with Kelly and going further also would never buy a 16D that wasn't certified. But as a rookie that coin looked good to me - what was the signal that something was wrong?
Member ANA and EAC "You got to lose to know how to win". Dream On by Aerosmith |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4337 Posts |
Kelly I won't answer for anyone else but for me the rims looked deep and cast struck, if that's even proper terminology.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4421 Posts |
Well stated, dsfreeworld.
The inner area of the D should be triangular in shape and not look more like a half-moon, as on the subject piece.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 17 / Views: 3,191 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 03/20/2014 06:50 am
