| Author |
 Replies: 17 / Views: 2,813 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3453 Posts |
I am playing devil's advocate here but do you think there is a chance there is luster that is not evident in the photo and maybe this is a righteous grade?
(CK ducks and runs for cover...)
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
The reverse looks like EF-45 to me. edit - the ebay coin. Edited by dave700x
07/03/2014 7:06 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7375 Posts |
I've studied this variety for many hours. The reverses on the higher grades are usually in decent shape. Where the rubber meets the road is on the obverse. My reverse is crisp and has full wheats too. My LIBERTY, date, IN GOD WE TRUST, and the wear on Lincoln's face is as good if not better than the one that got the AU50 grade. Theirs is definitely 5-10 points overgraded, and mine is 5 points undergraded. That's big $ on these coins. I'm weighing the possibility of a resubmission.
Edited by edweather
07/03/2014 6:35 pm
|
|
Moderator
 United States
16679 Posts |
Notoriously weakly struck obverse.
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
784 Posts |
Can you post some bigger pics of yours? I can't seem to see the detail very well. The one on ebay - the reverse looks EF45 maaaaaybe AU50. Admittedly, I am still not the greatest at weak strikes, but the obverse... I don't know. The rim letters are just about running into the rim and most of the detail is almost non-existent. I suppose this could make EF/AU? Looks like actual wear on the cheek and jaw only? I dunno, I'm not saying I disagree with your assessment, just my observation which is why I'd like to see yours better to compare the two. Either way you slice it, I'm jealous of your 22 plain! :) EDIT: Never mind on the pics, I just learned that I could just type your cert into the website and get them myself. :) Edited by rking007
07/03/2014 7:00 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7375 Posts |
Quote:
Can you post some bigger pics of yours? I can't seem to see the detail very well.
Yes, good catch, you can get them from the website.  The PCGS Trueview photos are a bit dark IMO. I have some much better (and brighter) photos at home that I'll add later. I grabbed the PCGS photo from work just to get something up to look at. I think the other guys reverse is a bit better than mine but not 15 points better, plus my obverse is definitely better than his. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2368 Posts |
Reverse looks EF to AU. Obverse is probably a weak strike IMO.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7375 Posts |
ok, so here are some pictures of my coin before it was slabbed.   The wheat lines in the ebay listing are a little better than mine. I'd hate to think that's what gave it a 15 point better grade. Out of the slabs, I'd still pick mine over his because of the obverse........but then again, if PCGS is giving crazy high marks for good wheats I might have to adjust my strategy if I ever buy another one. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3755 Posts |
Its PCGS. It HAS to be graded correctly. Remember, they are God and can not be questioned.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1037 Posts |
I am not defending TPG's, but they do use halogen lighting and some type of magnification to examine coins for grading. This combination allows the graders to see imperfections that the naked-eye cannot. On the human side, a TPG'er can be partial to some clients over others. I have heard of unhappy customers cracking open the disappointing graded coin and resubmitting it hoping to get a better grade. Personally, I will not send a coin to be graded, but I do buy graded coins from time to time. Coins like in the OP, I put in a 2x2 to preserve the coin. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3453 Posts |
 smokeriderdon! For one hot second I thought you drank a cup of koolaid. |
|
Valued Member
United States
374 Posts |
I have to say, there is a world of difference on the Reverse of the two coins, both in terms of the lines, color, contact marks, and blemishes.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
Strong reverse No Ds are graded primarily by the reverse. The ebay linked coin looks like it could make AU50 on the reverse. Yours might make XF40 but here again, discount the obverse that is virtually disregarded in grading these and it's easy to see why they graded them where they did. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7375 Posts |
OK then. Probably should focus more on the reverse in the future. I had no idea they were graded so heavily on the reverse.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
20753 Posts |
Isn't it possible that PCGS graded that coin back in 1922 or the way it was then? That would explain the AU grade.   |
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 17 / Views: 2,813 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 07/03/2014 5:54 pm
