| Author |
Replies: 39 / Views: 5,076 |
Page 3 of 3
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
459 Posts |
"To be more clear, some people expect that when you attach the word "error" to a coin that it has to be important and has to carry some form of premium value. This is simply not the case."Ok, thanks for the clarification. I attach the word "error" to mistake. My interpretation of any error piece is that it is the direct result of a MISTAKE made by (but not limited to) the engraver, striking, wrong planchet, or an entire step in the minting process being bypassed(ie coin not making it through the castaing machine). Die Deterioration has nothing to to with any mistakes (errors) being made. Here is an analogy/rhetorical I think best fits my argument. Do you consider coins with normal wear that has occurred while in circulation an error? (of course not) So, why would one consider the normal wear that a die experiences in it's service on the press an error? "...but the abnormality comes in the form of a die that has exceeded its life and should have been replaced...in a perfect world."
Again, I would say that this theory can be applied differently to different series and eras of the mint. The early mint did not have access to multiple dies to replace those that exceeded their die life. Many times obverse/reverse dies where married and remarried throughout different years to prolong/extend the the life of the die out of necessity rather than convenience. I have no problem with your argument. It is more an issue of semantics/syntax of the term "error" and how it is applied to die states.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7629 Posts |
I completely agree with you that die age and the minor imperfections that come with them are difficult to define as "errors", as in someone having made a mistake. This, however, is a literal definition of the word "error" - in numismatics the word isn't intended to be taken as literally as you are. I think that's where you're having trouble.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
459 Posts |
I am having no trouble, just a difference in opinion.
From PCGS Lingo: error A numismatic item that unintentionally varies from the norm. Ordinarily, overdates are not errors since they were done intentionally while other die-cutting "mistakes" are considered errors. Double dies, planchet clips, off-metal strikings, etc. also are errors.
die state A readily identified point in the life of a coinage die. Often dies clash and are polished, crack, break, etc., resulting in different stages of the die. These are called die states. Some coins have barely distinguishable die states, while others go through multiple distinctive ones.
From Coin Community Glossary: error A numismatic item that unintentionally varies from the norm. Ordinarily, overdates are not errors since they were done intentionally while other die-cutting "mistakes" are considered errors. Double dies, planchet clips, off-metal strikings, etc. also are errors.
Edited by Benji 08/17/2007 6:11 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7629 Posts |
And yet again published information proves my point. Those who study and understand doubled dies (and it is "doubled" with the "d") do not consider them errors. PCGS and the coin community glossary are incorrect.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
459 Posts |
I do not dispute that fact in the case of doubled dies. I have never disputed or even mentioned doubled dies. I am and have been referring to the fact that you(or your reference) considers die state/deterioration an error. This is where we have differing opinions.
Edited by Benji 08/17/2007 6:16 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7629 Posts |
Okay, so then we differ. I will hold to what I see as fact, and you can do the same. I never said that die state or deterioration was an error. Die wear is die wear. Die cracks are not die wear. Die cracks can happen at any state in a die's life. Die cracks develop, grow, and eventuate in broken dies, large die breaks, Cuds, and other related problems if the die is not removed from service. In my opinion (and that of others) the error begins at the point the crack develops, but is generally not considered collectible (of value) until the crack causes a more obvious problem.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3507 Posts |
I agree with Charles 1000% on this as well. Definitely incorrect in the PCGS glossary.
And I am glad that he pointed out that it is DOUBLED DIE wit a D :-) That one drives me nuts:-) Doubled Die not Double Die:-)
|
|
Valued Member
United States
176 Posts |
very nice post and very informative
|
|
New Member
United States
4 Posts |
Simply stated:
A "Variety" occurs in the production of the actual die ( master or working ) and an "Error" occurs in any other aspect of the coin production process ( i.e the striking, planchet production processes, etc.)
|
|
New Member
United States
27 Posts |
well copper so far you make cents lol I have few over each of the 60and the 60-d smalls small date about 100 of each in my safety deposit box I keep finding them the and the70-s I have just 8 of them.. and the 79 type 1 and 2 and 81 typ1 and 2 13 of those I just collect to have fun and give to my kids college funds 8 full sets of the 82 copper & copper zinc sets I collect when the first came out I bought a few roll then I cant even begin to go in to the a.m. pieces I have.. not stopped finding them I use to get roll 20 dollars at a time .. the late wife said enough so I stopped oh what a mistake... now I got out of the Cooper side and just roll and store all I have now I'm a half freak lol oooohhhh no I've gone through about $3000.so far and just keep die errors no fg, aw... so I can understand all I have read and enjoy the reading material it helps me understand a lot about my hobby I don't sell and thing I have collected that's up to my kids to do that or to carry it on
|
|
New Member
United States
15 Posts |
I hope its ok to reply to this, as its an older post, but I am trying to educate myself with the wealth of information on this site, and this post is amazing, and has clarified a lot for me. Or confused me more...not sure...too much information for me to absorb all at once, lol. I just wanted to say thanks, this has to be helpful to so many, especially me!
|
|
New Member
United States
8 Posts |
Hi, We purchased last weekend a graded by anacs triple die obv die 2 Washington quarter 1942 for 30.00 Could anyone possibly give us some info about this? We cannot find any information ourselves. We have tried. Could anyone possibly give us a rough idea of possible value of the coin?  Sorry the pics are not the greatest.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3507 Posts |
I cant find any information on it.
Edited by foundinrolls 01/05/2008 3:28 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5318 Posts |
This was an interesting writeup...thanks for posting that! 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
560 Posts |
Great discussion! Thanks.
|
|
Page 3 of 3
|
Replies: 39 / Views: 5,076 |
Page 3 of 3
|